← Brookline Select Board

Brookline Former Select Board member

Miriam Aschkenasy

Elected townwide · 3 terms in this record

A monthly email on how they voted, starting in November.

Board years

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Brookline ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Record at a glance · 2022–2023 Board

47 of 48meetings attended (98%) · whole board 99%
715votes cast by name (yes, no or abstain)
15no votes (2% of votes cast) · whole board 1%
12 of 32split votes where Aschkenasy was in the minority (38%) · whole board 24%
0abstained
3terms in this record

On split votes, Aschkenasy voted the same way as…

How these numbers work
  • Counted from the official minutes, for 2022–2023 Board only. Committee meetings and routine votes (adjourning, approving minutes) are not counted.
  • Attendance counts the meetings where the minutes list Aschkenasy as present or absent at the start.
  • Only votes the minutes record member by member are counted. Voice votes and votes given only as a count (for example 6-3 with no names) are not.
  • Percentages are shown only when there are at least 10 meetings or votes to count.
  • A split vote is one where at least one member voted yes and another voted no. “In the minority” means on the side with fewer votes; ties are not counted.
  • “Whole board” combines every member’s record for the same term.

These numbers describe the record; they are not a grade. A no vote, an abstention or a minority vote is neither good nor bad. MassVoter never rates officials.

Attendance

At the start of 47 of 48 Select Board meetings in 2022–2023 Board.

Missed

Every meeting (48)

Votes where members disagreed · 2022–2023 Board

Apr 25Allocate $475k to the Brookline for Racial Justice &…Motion: Voted to allocate $475k to the Brookline for Racial Justice &…Passed 3–1 · Aschkenasy: Yes

April 25, 2023: Allocate $475k to the Brookline for Racial Justice & Equity upon agreement of the grant conditions developed by the town

ApprovePassed · 3–1

Voted to allocate $475k to the Brookline for Racial Justice & Equity upon agreement of the grant conditions developed by the town.

Voted: Yes

Yes: Aschkenasy, Greene, SandmanNo: VanScoyoc

From the minutes

“Voted to allocate $475k to the Brookline for Racial Justice & Equity upon agreement of the grant conditions developed by the town. Aye: Bernard Greene, Miriam Aschkenasy, Michael Sandman Against: John VanScoyoc.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 7 (PDF)

Apr 25No Action on Article 4Motion: On motion it was, Voted 3-0 No Action on Article 4Passed 3–0 · Aschkenasy: Not recorded

April 25, 2023: No Action on Article 4

ApprovePassed · 3–0

On motion it was, Voted 3-0 No Action on Article 4

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocMiriam Aschkenasy is listed as absent for this vote.

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted 3-0 No Action on Article 4 Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc, Michael Sandman Absent: Miriam Aschkenasy.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 8 (PDF)

Apr 25Favorable Action on the Budget Article 7 as presented…Motion: Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on the Budget Article 7 as presented…Passed 3–1 · Aschkenasy: Yes

April 25, 2023: Favorable Action on the Budget Article 7 as presented by Ms. Goff with the Piece School project allocations

ApprovePassed · 3–1

Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on the Budget Article 7 as presented by Ms. Goff with the Piece School project allocations

Voted: Yes

Yes: Aschkenasy, Greene, SandmanNo: VanScoyoc

From the minutes

“1. Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on the Budget Article 7 as presented by Ms. Goff with the Piece School project allocations Aye: Bernard Greene, Miriam Aschkenasy, Michael Sandman Against: John VanScoyoc.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 8 (PDF)

Apr 25No Action on Article 12Motion: On motion it was, Voted No Action on Article 12Failed 2–2 · Aschkenasy: No

April 25, 2023: No Action on Article 12

ApproveFailed · 2–2

On motion it was, Voted No Action on Article 12

Voted: No

Yes: Greene, VanScoyocNo: Aschkenasy, Sandman

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted No Action on Article 12 Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc Against: Miriam Aschkenasy, Michael Sandman.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 15 (PDF)

Apr 25Favorable Action on Article 12Motion: Voted: 2-2 Favorable Action on Article 12Failed 2–2 · Aschkenasy: Yes

April 25, 2023: Favorable Action on Article 12

ApproveFailed · 2–2

Voted: 2-2 Favorable Action on Article 12

Voted: Yes

Yes: Aschkenasy, SandmanNo: Greene, VanScoyoc

From the minutes

“Voted: 2-2 Favorable Action on Article 12 Aye: Miriam Aschkenasy, Michael Sandman Against: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 15 (PDF)

Apr 25Refer Article 13 to the Town Administrator as outlined…Motion: On motion it was, Voted 3-1 to Refer Article 13 to…Passed 3–1 · Aschkenasy: No

April 25, 2023: Refer Article 13 to the Town Administrator as outlined by Chair Greene

ApprovePassed · 3–1

On motion it was, Voted 3-1 to Refer Article 13 to the Town Administrator as outlined by Chair Greene.

Voted: No

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocNo: Aschkenasy

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted 3-1 to Refer Article 13 to the Town Administrator as outlined by Chair Greene. Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc, Michael Sandman Against: Miriam Aschkenasy.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Apr 18Favorable Action on Article 10Motion: On motion it was, Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on Article 10Passed 3–1 · Aschkenasy: No

April 18, 2023: Favorable Action on Article 10

ApprovePassed · 3–1

On motion it was, Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on Article 10

Voted: No

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocNo: Aschkenasy

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted 3-1 Favorable Action on Article 10 Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc, Michael Sandman Against: Miriam Aschkenasy,.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Apr 18The proposed slate of the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee.…Motion: On motion it was, Voted the proposed slate of the MBTA-CA…Passed 3–0 · Aschkenasy: Not recorded

April 18, 2023: The proposed slate of the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee. committee members: Dick Benka (chair) Rick Fredkin Carol Gladstone Ken Lewis Linda Olson Pehlke David Pollak Katha Seidman Neil...

ApprovePassed · 3–0

On motion it was, Voted the proposed slate of the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee. committee members: Dick Benka (chair) Rick Fredkin Carol Gladstone Ken Lewis Linda Olson Pehlke David Pollak Katha Seidman Neil Wishinsky

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocMiriam Aschkenasy is listed as absent for this vote.

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted the proposed slate of the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee. committee members: Dick Benka (chair) Rick Fredkin Carol Gladstone Ken Lewis Linda Olson Pehlke David Pollak Katha Seidman Neil Wishinsky Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc, Michael Sandman Absent: Miriam Aschkenasy.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Apr 18Approve the proposed charge for the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting…Motion: On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed charge for…Passed 3–0 · Aschkenasy: Not recorded

April 18, 2023: Approve the proposed charge for the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee: Purpose The MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee (the Committee) will identify, develop, and analyze potential...

ApprovePassed · 3–0

On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed charge for the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee: Purpose The MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee (the Committee) will identify, develop, and analyze potential options for complying with the MBTA Communities Act, in parallel to the work already underway along Harvard Street, so that Town Meeting can be presented with credible and meaningful alternatives in considering how best to comply with that Act's requirements. The Committee shall focus on developing potential options that could but need not include portions of the Harvard Street study area that: (i) seek to minimize adverse impact to commercial districts and existing businesses, (ii) include at least one option likely to incentivize the creation of additional housing units that are suitable for all stages of life and income levels, and (iii) take into consideration the location of additional housing relative to available capacity for open space, schools, and other public infrastructure. Scope The Committee, with the support of the Department of Planning and community Development, will make recommendations to the Select Board on proposed solutions (which could but need not include portions of Harvard Street), including any site plan review standards that affect the theoretical housing yield, by July 14, 2023, or as soon thereafter as reasonably feasible. That will likely give enough time for the State to review potential options submitted by the Select Board ove

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocMiriam Aschkenasy is listed as absent for this vote.

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed charge for the MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee: Purpose The MBTA-CA Multifamily Permitting Committee (the Committee) will identify, develop, and analyze potential options for complying with the MBTA Communities Act, in parallel to the work already underway along Harvard Street, so that Town Meeting can be presented with credible and meaningful alternatives in considering how best to comply with that Act's requirements. The Committee shall focus on developing potential options that could but need not include portions of the Harvard Street study area that: (i) seek to minimize adverse impact to commercial districts and existing businesses, (ii) include at least one option likely to incentivize the creation of additional housing units that are suitable for all stages of life and income levels, and (iii) take into consideration the location of additional housing relative to available capacity for open space, schools, and other public infrastructure. Scope The Committee, with the support of the Department of Planning and community Development, will make recommendations to the Select Board on proposed solutions (which could but need not include portions of Harvard Street), including any site plan review standards that affect the theoretical housing yield, by July 14, 2023, or as soon thereafter as reasonably feasible. That will likely give enough time for the State to review potential options submitted by the Select Board over the summer. Following this process, the Committee will assist staff in drafting warrant articles and related materials, including site plan review standards in time for Fall 2023 Town Meeting (estimating August 31st warrant article deadline). Committee meetings will be held remotely via zoom. Prior to making recommendations to the Select Board, the Committee shall: Notify property owners and tenants (including commercial tenants) of at least one public hearing of any proposed zoning changes; Develop two or more solutions for MBTA Communities Act compliance, with a goal of at least one solution that would likely incentivize at least 699 net new housing units constructed (10% of the theoretical housing capacity required by the State) - which could but need not include solutions being developed on Harvard Street, or be entirely separate from Harvard Street; Evaluate the possibility of compliance through the use of, but not necessarily limited to, existing T (two-family) zones and M (multi-family) zones; and Consider and resolve to the extent feasible any unintended consequences updated zoning may have, including impacts of the MBTA-CA parking model, negative impacts on existing businesses, climate resiliency, potential demolition of existing housing stock or loss of character-defining features of the Town..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 10 (PDF)

Apr 11Approve the proposed slate for the second round of…Motion: On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed slate for…Passed 3–1 · Aschkenasy: No

April 11, 2023: Approve the proposed slate for the second round of American Rescue Plan Act funds as presented by the American Rescue Plan Submission Review Committee subject to satisfactory terms and conditions...

ApprovePassed · 3–1

On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed slate for the second round of American Rescue Plan Act funds as presented by the American Rescue Plan Submission Review Committee subject to satisfactory terms and conditions specified by the Town, minus the allocation to the Brookline for Racial Justice and Equity allocation of $475k.

Voted: No

Yes: Greene, Sandman, VanScoyocNo: Aschkenasy

From the minutes

“On motion it was, Voted to approve the proposed slate for the second round of American Rescue Plan Act funds as presented by the American Rescue Plan Submission Review Committee subject to satisfactory terms and conditions specified by the Town, minus the allocation to the Brookline for Racial Justice and Equity allocation of $475k. Aye: Bernard Greene, John VanScoyoc, Michael Sandman Against: Miriam Aschkenasy.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 7 (PDF)

Votes with no disagreement (633)

    From the Brookline Select Board’s official minutes, posted on the town’s CivicClerk meetings portal. We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos: Brookline.News (candidate profiles, 2024 and 2026) and the Michael Rubenstein for Brookline Select Board campaign website.

    How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
    Get an email when new quizzes open

    MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

    Report an error on this page

    See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.