← Chelmsford Select Board

Chelmsford Former Select Board member

George Dixon

At-large · 8 terms in this record

George Dixon, Jr.

A monthly email on how they voted, starting in November.

Board years

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Chelmsford ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Record at a glance · 2018–2019 Board

24 of 26meetings attended (92%) · whole board 95%
222votes cast by name (yes, no or abstain)
8no votes (4% of votes cast) · whole board 2%
5 of 14split votes where Dixon was in the minority (36%) · whole board 30%
4abstained
8terms in this record

On split votes, Dixon voted the same way as…

How these numbers work
  • Counted from the official minutes, for 2018–2019 Board only. Committee meetings and routine votes (adjourning, approving minutes) are not counted.
  • Attendance counts the meetings where the minutes list Dixon as present or absent at the start.
  • Only votes the minutes record member by member are counted. Voice votes and votes given only as a count (for example 6-3 with no names) are not.
  • Percentages are shown only when there are at least 10 meetings or votes to count.
  • A split vote is one where at least one member voted yes and another voted no. “In the minority” means on the side with fewer votes; ties are not counted.
  • “Whole board” combines every member’s record for the same term.

These numbers describe the record; they are not a grade. A no vote, an abstention or a minority vote is neither good nor bad. MassVoter never rates officials.

Attendance

At the start of 24 of 26 Select Board meetings in 2018–2019 Board.

Missed

Every meeting (26)

Votes where members disagreed · 2018–2019 Board

Mar 25Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2019,…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of…Passed 4–0 · Dixon: Yes

March 25, 2019: Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2019, as presented

Approve minutesPassed · 4–0

Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2019, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Wojtas. Selectman Antul abstained, all others in favor.

Voted: Yes

Yes: Diggs, Dixon, Lefebvre, WojtasAbstained: Antul

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2019, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Wojtas. Selectman Antul abstained, all others in favor. Motion carries, 4-0..” (Motion: Lefebvre, second: Wojtas)

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Mar 11Approve the Tri-Board Meeting minutes of December 10, 2018,…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Tri-Board Meeting minutes of…Passed 4–0 · Dixon: Abstained

March 11, 2019: Approve the Tri-Board Meeting minutes of December 10, 2018, as presented

Approve minutesPassed · 4–0

Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Tri-Board Meeting minutes of December 10, 2018, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Selectman Dixon abstained, all others in favor

Voted: Abstained

Yes: Antul, Diggs, Lefebvre, WojtasAbstained: Dixon

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Tri-Board Meeting minutes of December 10, 2018, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Selectman Dixon abstained, all others in favor Motion carries, 4-0..” (Motion: Lefebvre, second: Antul)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Feb 25Approve the Regular Meeting Minute of February 4, 2019,…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minute of…Passed 3–0 · Dixon: Not recorded

February 25, 2019: Approve the Regular Meeting Minute of February 4, 2019, as presented

ApprovePassed · 3–0

Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minute of February 4, 2019, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Chairman Diggs abstained, all others in favor.

Yes: Antul, Lefebvre, WojtasAbstained: Diggs

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to approve the Regular Meeting Minute of February 4, 2019, as presented. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Chairman Diggs abstained, all others in favor. Motion carries, 3-0..” (Motion: Lefebvre, second: Antul)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Feb 4Recommend approval of Article 3 of the Special Town…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Antul to recommend approval of Article 3 of…Passed 3–0 · Dixon: Yes

February 4, 2019 (Special meeting): Recommend approval of Article 3 of the Special Town Meeting, which funds this arbitration award

ApprovePassed · 3–0

Motion: by Selectman Antul to recommend approval of Article 3 of the Special Town Meeting, which funds this arbitration award. Selectman Dixon seconded the motion.

Voted: Yes

Yes: Antul, Dixon, WojtasAbstained: Lefebvre

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Antul to recommend approval of Article 3 of the Special Town Meeting, which funds this arbitration award. Selectman Dixon seconded the motion. Motion carries, unanimous, 3-0, with Selectman Lefebvre abstaining..” (Motion: Antul, second: Dixon)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Jan 28Recommend approval of Article 1Motion: Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend approval of Article 1. Seconded…Passed 4–1 · Dixon: No

January 28, 2019: Recommend approval of Article 1

ApprovePassed · 4–1

Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend approval of Article 1. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Selectmen Wojtas, Lefebvre, Antul and Diggs in favor, Selectman Dixon opposed

Voted: No

Yes: Antul, Diggs, Lefebvre, WojtasNo: Dixon

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend approval of Article 1. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Selectmen Wojtas, Lefebvre, Antul and Diggs in favor, Selectman Dixon opposed Motion carries, 4-1..” (Motion: Lefebvre, second: Antul)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Jan 28Recommend against Article 2Motion: Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend against Article 2. Seconded by…Passed 3–1 · Dixon: No

January 28, 2019: Recommend against Article 2

ApprovePassed · 3–1

Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend against Article 2. Seconded by Selectman Wojtas. Selectman Antul abstained, Selectman Dixon opposed, Selectmen Diggs, Wojtas and Lefebvre in favor,

Voted: No

Yes: Diggs, Lefebvre, WojtasNo: DixonAbstained: Antul

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Lefebvre to recommend against Article 2. Seconded by Selectman Wojtas. Selectman Antul abstained, Selectman Dixon opposed, Selectmen Diggs, Wojtas and Lefebvre in favor, Motion carries, 3-1-1..” (Motion: Lefebvre, second: Wojtas)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Jan 28Invite all candidates running for a town-wide position in…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Antul for the Board to invite all candidates…Passed 4–1 · Dixon: Yes

January 28, 2019: Invite all candidates running for a town-wide position in the Town's April 2, 2019 election, after nominations are closed, to introduce themselves in a public forum

AppointPassed · 4–1

Motion: by Selectman Antul for the Board to invite all candidates running for a town-wide position in the Town's April 2, 2019 election, after nominations are closed, to introduce themselves in a public forum. Seconded by Selectman Dixon. Selectman Wojtas opposed, all others in favor.

Voted: Yes

Yes: Antul, Diggs, Dixon, LefebvreNo: Wojtas

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Antul for the Board to invite all candidates running for a town-wide position in the Town's April 2, 2019 election, after nominations are closed, to introduce themselves in a public forum. Seconded by Selectman Dixon. Selectman Wojtas opposed, all others in favor. Motion carries, 4-1..” (Motion: Antul, second: Dixon)

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Jan 28Request a donation of $50,000 from the developer in…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to request a donation of $50,000 from…Passed 4–1 · Dixon: No

January 28, 2019: Request a donation of $50,000 from the developer in consideration for granting the proposed easement off Tobin Avenue

ApprovePassed · 4–1

Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to request a donation of $50,000 from the developer in consideration for granting the proposed easement off Tobin Avenue. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Roll Call Vote: Chairman Diggs: Aye Selectman Antul: Aye Selectman Dixon: No Selectman Wojtas: Aye Selectman Lefebvre: Aye

Voted: No

Yes: Antul, Diggs, Lefebvre, WojtasNo: Dixon

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to request a donation of $50,000 from the developer in consideration for granting the proposed easement off Tobin Avenue. Seconded by Selectman Antul. Roll Call Vote: Chairman Diggs: Aye Selectman Antul: Aye Selectman Dixon: No Selectman Wojtas: Aye Selectman Lefebvre: Aye The motion carries, 4-1..” (Motion: Wojtas, second: Antul)

Read it in the official minutes, page 11 (PDF)

Jan 7Appoint Michael Walsh to the Planning Board, for an…Motion: Motion: by Mr. Kohl to appoint Michael Walsh to the Planning…Passed Unanimous, 5 present · Dixon: Yes

January 7, 2019: Appoint Michael Walsh to the Planning Board, for an unexpired term ending April 2, 2019

AppointPassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Motion: by Mr. Kohl to appoint Michael Walsh to the Planning Board, for an unexpired term ending April 2, 2019. Seconded by Mr., Houle. Roll call: Mr. Raisbeck: Aye Mr. Kohl: Aye Mr. Houle: Aye Mr. Shanahan: Aye Mr. Parlee: Aye Mr. Van Dyne: Aye Selectman Wojtas: Aye Selectman Lefebvre: Aye Selectman Dixon: Aye Selectman Antul: Aye Chairman Diggs: Aye

Voted: Yes

The count (11-0) includes the other board’s members; only the Select Board members’ votes are shown. This was a joint vote with another board; only the Select Board members’ votes are shown. The motion was made by a member of the other board.

From the minutes

“Motion: by Mr. Kohl to appoint Michael Walsh to the Planning Board, for an unexpired term ending April 2, 2019. Seconded by Mr., Houle. Roll call: Mr. Raisbeck: Aye Mr. Kohl: Aye Mr. Houle: Aye Mr. Shanahan: Aye Mr. Parlee: Aye Mr. Van Dyne: Aye Selectman Wojtas: Aye Selectman Lefebvre: Aye Selectman Dixon: Aye Approved 3/25/2019 Selectman Antul: Aye Chairman Diggs: Aye Motion carries, unanimous, 11-0..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Dec 3Maintain a single tax rate with a residential factor…Motion: Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to maintain a single tax rate with…Failed 2–3 · Dixon: No

December 3, 2018: Maintain a single tax rate with a residential factor of 1

ApproveFailed · 2–3

Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to maintain a single tax rate with a residential factor of 1. Seconded by Selectman Lefebvre. Discussion: Selectman Wojtas thanked everyone who has participated in this process. She agreed there is need for more business investment in town, and progress is being made in this area. There is growth among businesses. The Economic Development Director is trying to get new business in town. Impacts from tax revenue haven't been seen yet, and could take 4-5 years to be seen. Tax policy shouldn't make everyone adversaries. Businesses do pay more taxes. They will pay for storm water management. They pay property taxes. They expect increases, but not big ones. They contribute to local events and organizations. She still feels the best outcome for the entire town is to maintain a single rate. Selectman Lefebvre wanted to promote business development in town, and he knew it would be a 7-11 year project. He has watched meetings here and in other towns, and noted that business values are going down in many towns. He believes there is a disconnect between businesses and property owners. He found studies that show the values of the properties go down, which eventually shifts the tax burden back to the residents. The stormwater assessments will already shock the system. Much will depend on the elasticity of businesses and their ability to be able increase their prices. Meanwhile, residents want well- paying jobs, and to attract those employers. He would recommend

Voted: No

Yes: Lefebvre, WojtasNo: Antul, Diggs, Dixon

From the minutes

“Motion: by Selectman Wojtas to maintain a single tax rate with a residential factor of 1. Seconded by Selectman Lefebvre. Discussion: Selectman Wojtas thanked everyone who has participated in this process. She agreed there is need for more business investment in town, and progress is being made in this area. There is growth among businesses. The Economic Development Director is trying to get new business in town. Impacts from tax revenue haven't been seen yet, and could take 4-5 years to be seen. Tax policy shouldn't make everyone adversaries. Businesses do pay more taxes. They will pay for storm water management. They pay property taxes. They expect increases, but not big ones. They contribute to local events and organizations. She still feels the best outcome for the entire town is to maintain a single rate. Selectman Lefebvre wanted to promote business development in town, and he knew it would be a 7-11 year project. He has watched meetings here and in other towns, and noted that business values are going down in many towns. He believes there is a disconnect between businesses and property owners. He found studies that show the values of the properties go down, which eventually shifts the tax burden back to the residents. The stormwater assessments will already shock the system. Much will depend on the elasticity of businesses and their ability to be able increase their prices. Meanwhile, residents want well- paying jobs, and to attract those employers. He would recommend not splitting the tax rate. Selectman Dixon indicated that he would vote for a split, as the time has come. He promised this when he ran for election. The town has tried to encourage business development and residents have opposed the efforts. Selectman Antul felt flat taxes do not work. She works in a town with a 2:1 split, and believes it works fine; companies still donate to Town causes. She felt taxes are not a major factor for businesses deciding where to locate. Businesses are looking at worker availability, transportation and other things. Taxes will still go up. $200-400.00 does make a difference to many families. She is hearing from Town Meeting Representatives who have heard from residents. The Board has been offering ways to generate revenue. All have been rejected. Auditors have confirmed Chelmsford manages its money well. Something has got to give. Chairman Diggs agreed this has been a complex process. He felt that the study committee did its due diligence, and some businesses will be detracted by a split rate. The Town is trying to achieve economic development, and a flat rate has not attracted more business. He acknowledged that the Board and its views may change in future years. All towns will have to deal with stormwater cost increases. The tax classification study report had no conclusions one way or the other; and both sides have legitimate concerns and arguments. The status quo has gotten the Town nowhere, and it may be time for a change. Future boards will decide whether to change the rates. The impacts of the savings will not change. The bills will go up, but the savings will still be there. One of the valid reasons for splitting the tax rate is to correct an imbalance in the total amount of money collected from residential taxpayers as opposed to that collected from the commercial/industrial segment. In recent years, there has been a sharp increase in the assessment of residential homes vs the slower growth of commercial/industrial business in Chelmsford. Therefore, to put the relationship back in its historic balance, he would vote to split the tax rate. Roll call vote: Selectman Wojtas: aye Selectman Lefebvre: aye Selectman Dixon: opposed Approved 2/11/2019 Selectman Antul: opposed Chairman Diggs: opposed Motion fails, 2-3..” (Motion: Wojtas, second: Lefebvre)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Votes with no disagreement (195)

    From the Chelmsford Select Board’s official minutes in the town’s Agenda Center. We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos: Town of Chelmsford, Select Board page (official board photo, captioned by name; cropped by MassVoter).

    How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
    Get an email when new quizzes open

    MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

    Report an error on this page

    See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.