MassVoter.com← Taunton Municipal CouncilTaunton Former Councilor
At-large · 2 terms in this record
A monthly email on how they voted, starting in November.
On split votes, Dermody voted the same way as…
These numbers describe the record; they are not a grade. A no vote, an abstention or a minority vote is neither good nor bad. MassVoter never rates officials.
At the start of 20 of 20 Municipal Council meetings in 2020–2021 Council.
Missed none.
May 2, 2020: The motion was clarified to be as follows:
To approve the first amendment to the host community agreement between the city of taunton and herbal logic llc, with an address.of 239 broadway. the applicant's host community agreement will be extended to april 4, 2021 and paragraph 7 will be amended as previously stated by attorney gould
Voted: No
Yes: Coute, McCaul, Pottier, SandersNo: Carr, Cleary, Croteau, DermodyAbsent: Postell
“MOTION: TO APPROVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE HOST COMMUNITY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF TAUNTON AND HERBAL LOGIC LLC, WITH AN ADDRESS.OF 239 BROADWAY. THE APPLICANT'S HOST COMMUNITY AGREEMENT WILL BE EXTENDED TO APRIL 4, 2021 AND PARAGRAPH 7 WILL BE AMENDED AS PREVIOUSLY STATED BY ATTORNEY GOULD. ON A ROLL CALL VOTE, COUNCILORS MCCAUL, POTTIER, COUTE AND SANDERS VOTING IN FAVOR, COUNCILORS CLEARY, CROTEAU, CARR AND DERMODY VOTING IN OPPOSITION. MOTION DOES NOT CARRY. Councilor Pottier then made the following motion: : MOTION: TO RECONSIDER IN ONE WEEK SINCE COUNCILOR POSTELL IS NOT HERE FOR THE MOTION. : THE MOTION WAS VOTED ON WITH COUNCILORS MCCAUL, POTTIER, COUTE, SANDERS, CLEARY, CROTEAU AND DERMODY VOTING IN FAVOR. COUNCILOR CARR VOTING IN OPPOSITION. MOTION CARRIES..”
April 28, 2020: He thinks that the Council should support the City Solicitor and move forward.
To call for the vote
Voted: No
Yes: Coute, Croteau, McCaul, PostellNo: Carr, Cleary, Dermody, Pottier, Sanders
“Councilor McCaul made a motion to call for the vote. On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, four (4) Councilors voting in favor and five (5) Councilors voting in opposition, Councilors Postell, Coute, McCaul and Croteau voting in favor. Councilors Carr, Pottier, Dermody, Cleary, and Sanders voting in opposition. MOTION DOES NOT CARRY..” (Motion: McCaul)
April 28, 2020: Councilor McCaul made a motion to call for the vote.
To approve
The minutes give only the count (4–5), not how each councilor voted.
“On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, five (5) Councilors voting in opposition and four (4) Councilors voting in favor..”
March 24, 2020: He stated that perhaps the records would reflect that and they should probably follow the same criteria if the majority of the Council wishes to do that.
To move the question
Voted: Yes
Yes: Carr, Coute, Croteau, Dermody, McCaul, Postell, PottierNo: Cleary, Sanders
“Councilor Croteau made a motion to move the question. On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, seven (7) Councilors voting in favor. Councilors Cleary and Sanders voting in opposition..” (Motion: Croteau)
March 24, 2020: On a roll call 7 vote, nine (9) Councilors present, nine (9) Councilors voting in favor.
For the overall issue of making changes, not this specific one in the permitting process that may come before any agency to develop a more business friendly approach be referred to the Committee to the Council as a Whole with a date certain to be discussed
Voted: Yes
Yes: Carr, Croteau, Dermody, Postell, PottierNo: Cleary, Coute, McCaul, Sanders
“Councilor Croteau made a motion for the overall issue of making changes, not this specific one in the permitting process that may come before any agency to develop a more business friendly approach be referred to the Committee to the Council as a Whole with a date certain to be discussed. On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, five (5) Councilors : voting in favor, Councilors Coute, McCaul, Cleary and Sanders voting in opposition. MOTION CARRIES..” (Motion: Croteau)
March 24, 2020: Mayor O'Connell stated that they need to either withdraw the motion or vote on the motion.
To press the question
Voted: Yes
Yes: Cleary, Coute, Croteau, Dermody, McCaul, Postell, PottierNo: Carr, Sanders
“Motion was made to press the question. On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, seven (7) Councilors voting in favor. Councilors Sanders and Carr voting in opposition..”
March 17, 2020: He thinks that flexibility is the way to go and we don't know what tomorrow is going to bring.
To approve
Voted: Yes
Yes: Coute, Croteau, Dermody, McCaul, Postell, Pottier, SandersNo: Carr, Cleary
“On a roll call vote, nine (9) Councilors present, seven (7) Councilors voting in favor and two (2) Councilors voting in opposition. Councilors Cleary and Carr voting in opposition..”
From the official minutes kept by the Taunton City Clerk (agendas and minutes). From the Taunton Municipal Council’s official minutes, posted in the city’s Agenda Center. Most items pass by voice (“So voted”), and the minutes record only the result for those; how each councilor voted is shown for roll calls. MassVoter never grades officials; votes and attendance are shown exactly as the minutes record them. MassVoter never grades officials; votes and attendance are shown exactly as the minutes record them. Councilor photos: City of Taunton Municipal Council page (taunton-ma.gov). Former councilors show initials.
How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →