MassVoter.com← Stoneham Select BoardStoneham Former Select Board member
At-large · 2 terms in this record
A monthly email on how they voted, starting in November.
Your Stoneham ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.
Start my ballot →On split votes, Wilson voted the same way as…
These numbers describe the record; they are not a grade. A no vote, an abstention or a minority vote is neither good nor bad. MassVoter never rates officials.
At the start of 22 of 23 Select Board meetings in 2018–2019 Board.
Missed
March 19, 2019: Approve the minutes of 2/6/19
Parker moved to approve the minutes of 2/6/19. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted (3-0-2) with Wilson and Colarusso abstaining.
Voted: Abstained
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, SeiboldAbstained: Colarusso, Wilson
“Parker moved to approve the minutes of 2/6/19. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted (3-0-2) with Wilson and Colarusso abstaining..” (Motion: Parker, second: Seibold)
March 19, 2019: Approve the 3/12/19 minutes with the additional language
Wilson moved to approve the 3/12/19 minutes with the additional language. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted (4-0-1) with Colarusso abstaining.
Voted: Yes
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonAbstained: Colarusso
“Wilson moved to approve the 3/12/19 minutes with the additional language. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted (4-0-1) with Colarusso abstaining..” (Motion: Wilson, second: Seibold)
March 5, 2019: Look favorably on Articles 13 and 14
Wilson moved to accept and number 13 and 14 and look favorably on them. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted unanimously to accept and number 13 and 14. Voted 4-1 to look favorably on the article
One motion was voted in two parts: “Voted unanimously to accept and number 13 and 14. Voted 4-1 to look favorably on the article”; the minutes do not say who voted no, so the count only is shown for this part. The minutes record the vote as “Voted 4-1” but do not say who voted which way, so the count only is shown.
“Wilson moved to accept and number 13 and 14 and look favorably on them. Seibold seconded the motion. Voted unanimously to accept and number 13 and 14. Voted 4-1 to look favorably on the article.” (Motion: Wilson, second: Seibold)
March 5, 2019: Look favorably on this article
Colarusso moved to look favorably on this article. Wilson seconded the motion. Motion fails 1-4 with Colarusso voting in the affirmative.
Voted: No
Yes: ColarussoNo: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonThe minutes record “Motion fails 1-4” “with Colarusso voting in the affirmative”; the other members present are shown voting no.
“Colarusso moved to look favorably on this article. Wilson seconded the motion. Motion fails 1-4 with Colarusso voting in the affirmative..” (Motion: Colarusso, second: Wilson)
March 5, 2019: Revisit this matter in 2 weeks
Wilson moved to revisit this matter in 2 weeks. Colarusso seconded the motion. Motion fails. Voted 2-3
The minutes record the vote as “Voted 2-3” but do not say who voted which way, so the count only is shown.
“Wilson moved to revisit this matter in 2 weeks. Colarusso seconded the motion. Motion fails. Voted 2-3.” (Motion: Wilson, second: Colarusso)
March 5, 2019: Look unfavorably on this article
Seibold moved to look unfavorably on this article. Parker seconded the motion. Parker apologized for her outburst and stated that when she ran for the seat she checked into any conflict of interest and was advised that she could run. Kathy Sullivan stated that MGL 268A allows every employee the right to run Select Board. Voted 4-0-1 with Colarusso abstaining.
Voted: Yes
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonAbstained: Colarusso
“Seibold moved to look unfavorably on this article. Parker seconded the motion. Parker apologized for her outburst and stated that when she ran for the seat she checked into any conflict of interest and was advised that she could run. Kathy Sullivan stated that MGL 268A allows every employee the right to run Select Board. Voted 4-0-1 with Colarusso abstaining..” (Motion: Seibold, second: Parker)
March 5, 2019: Accept the Human Rights Commission policy
Seibold moved to accept the HRC policy. Parker seconded the motion. Colarusso moved to amend the motion to accept the policy with the exception of the reporting requirement. Wilson asked Colarusso what changes she would like and asked if she would support it if the word "report" is changed to "refer". Colarusso stated that she would like to see language stating that the HRC will provide residents with information regarding filing complaints with state and local agencies. Colarusso's amendment was not seconded. Seibold's original motion carries (4-1) with Colarusso voting no.
Voted: Yes
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonNo: ColarussoCaroline Colarusso’s amendment (removing the reporting requirement) was not seconded; the minutes record “Seibold’s original motion carries (4-1) with Colarusso voting no.”
“Seibold moved to accept the HRC policy. Parker seconded the motion. Colarusso moved to amend the motion to accept the policy with the exception of the reporting requirement. Wilson asked Colarusso what changes she would like and asked if she would support it if the word "report" is changed to "refer". Colarusso stated that she would like to see language stating that the HRC will provide residents with information regarding filing complaints with state and local agencies. Colarusso's amendment was not seconded. Seibold's original motion carries (4-1) with Colarusso voting no..” (Motion: Seibold, second: Parker)
February 19, 2019: Accept the minutes of 12/4/18
Seibold moved to accept the minutes of 12/4/18. Wilson seconded the motion. The vote was (4-0-1) with Colarusso abstaining.
Voted: Yes
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonAbstained: Colarusso
“Seibold moved to accept the minutes of 12/4/18. Wilson seconded the motion. The vote was (4-0-1) with Colarusso abstaining..” (Motion: Seibold, second: Wilson)
February 19, 2019: Sign the letter presented by STAC
Seibold moved to sign the letter presented by STAC. Wilson seconded the motion. Voted (4-1) with Colarusso voting in the negative.
Voted: Yes
Yes: MacNeill, Parker, Seibold, WilsonNo: Colarusso
“Seibold moved to sign the letter presented by STAC. Wilson seconded the motion. Voted (4-1) with Colarusso voting in the negative..” (Motion: Seibold, second: Wilson)
February 19, 2019: Approve Bear Hill Golf Club's request for Change of Officers
Parker moved to approve Bear Hill Golf Club's request for Change of Officers. Wilson seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in Favor: Chairwoman MacNeill Vice Chairwoman Parker Clerk Seibold Selectman Wilson Selectwoman Colarusso Motion carries (4-0)
The roll call lists Voting in Favor: Chairwoman MacNeill, Vice Chairwoman Parker, Clerk Seibold, Selectman Wilson, Selectwoman Colarusso, but the minutes record the vote as “Motion carries (4-0)”; the count and the names do not match, so the count only is shown.
“Parker moved to approve Bear Hill Golf Club's request for Change of Officers. Wilson seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in Favor: Chairwoman MacNeill Vice Chairwoman Parker Clerk Seibold Selectman Wilson Selectwoman Colarusso Motion carries (4-0).” (Motion: Parker, second: Wilson)
From the Stoneham Select Board’s official minutes, posted in the town’s Agenda Center (Select Board). We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos: Town of Stoneham, Select Board page (captioned group photo). Cropped by MassVoter. Former members show initials.
How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →