MassVoter.com← Campaign moneyMoney for and against
Question 6: Nature for All Fund
A YES vote would create a fund that could be utilized for natural resource conservation that would receive some state taxes collected on the sale and use of sporting goods and recreational vehicles, and the use of golf courses. A NO vote would not create this natural resource conservation fund or change how sales and use taxes are spent.
For YES
$580,386spent on this question in 2026
Committees
- Vote Yes for Water and NatureRaised $3,477,374 in 2025–26 · spent on this question $580,386
Top donors (organizations), 2025–26
- Mass Audubon $603,349
- The Trustees of Reservations $563,964
- Conservation Law Foundation $308,721
- The Nature Conservancy $76,527
- Trust For Public Land $69,616
For NO
No committee is registered with OCPF on this side.
How to read this
- Ballot question committees report to OCPF, the state’s campaign finance office. OCPF lists which committees are for (YES) and against (NO) each question.
- “Spent on this question” is OCPF’s figure. When one committee works on more than one question, OCPF splits its general spending between them.
- “Raised” is the committee’s total for the two years, including goods and services given in place of money (in-kind). A committee working on several questions raises one pot of money, so it is listed under each of its questions.
- Top donors are organizations only, added up across the committees on that side, with names spelled as the committees reported them. MassVoter does not show the names of individual donors.
- MassVoter updates these numbers every night from OCPF. Last update: October 12, 2026.
These numbers describe the money; they are not a grade. Raising more or less is neither good nor bad. MassVoter does not connect donations to votes or positions.