MassVoter
Nature for All Fund
5 questions · pick the answer closest to your view
1 / 5
Should Massachusetts create a Nature for All Fund paid for with sales taxes already collected on sporting goods, recreational vehicles and golf courses?
Sources (Ballot Question 6): A and B: What your vote will do and AG summary, p. 16. A: argument in favor (no new tax; dedicates sales tax already paid). Authors: Argument in favor by Mass Audubon; Argument against compiled by the Secretary of the Commonwealth from the Legislature's majority report (no organized No group). Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions majority report, pp. 32-33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Information for Voters 2026, Question 6 pp. 16-17 (https://www.sec.state.ma.us/divisions/elections/research-and-statistics/information-for-voters-2026.htm). Also A: Heather Clish, Trustees of Reservations (YES on 6), FRC Media interview posted Sept 2026 (2:46-3:25, about $25 million a year now vs. about $350 million needed; up to $100 million a year; 7:14-7:28, does not raise taxes).
2 / 5
What worries you more?
Sources (Ballot Question 6): A: argument in favor (clean drinking water, pollution, flooding, forests, farms, habitat). B: fiscal statement, p. 16 (diverts tens of millions a year from the operating budget); majority report (reallocation from other programs). Authors: Argument in favor by Mass Audubon; Argument against compiled by the Secretary of the Commonwealth from the Legislature's majority report (no organized No group). Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions majority report, pp. 32-33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Information for Voters 2026, Question 6 pp. 16-17 (https://www.sec.state.ma.us/divisions/elections/research-and-statistics/information-for-voters-2026.htm). Also A: Heather Clish, Trustees of Reservations (YES on 6), FRC Media interview posted Sept 2026 (7:47-8:26, up to $100 million is about 0.16% of the $63.5 billion state budget).
3 / 5
Should this money be set aside for one purpose, or weighed against other needs each year?
Sources (Ballot Question 6): A: argument in favor (as much as $100 million a year; permanently protect). B: argument against and majority report (appropriations stay subject to annual budget deliberation and prioritization). Authors: Argument in favor by Mass Audubon; Argument against compiled by the Secretary of the Commonwealth from the Legislature's majority report (no organized No group). Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions majority report, pp. 32-33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Information for Voters 2026, Question 6 pp. 16-17 (https://www.sec.state.ma.us/divisions/elections/research-and-statistics/information-for-voters-2026.htm). Also A: Heather Clish, Trustees of Reservations (YES on 6), FRC Media interview posted Sept 2026 (9:39-10:15, the environment is often one of the first things cut when money is tight).
4 / 5
The Legislature would still decide each year whether to put money in the fund. Does Question 6 still matter?
Sources (Ballot Question 6): A: AG summary, pp. 16-17 (fund, 15-member board, annual report); argument in favor (strict oversight and annual reporting). B: majority report (would neither guarantee additional funding nor materially change the status quo); fiscal statement (substantial implementation costs). Authors: Argument in favor by Mass Audubon; Argument against compiled by the Secretary of the Commonwealth from the Legislature's majority report (no organized No group). Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions majority report, pp. 32-33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Information for Voters 2026, Question 6 pp. 16-17 (https://www.sec.state.ma.us/divisions/elections/research-and-statistics/information-for-voters-2026.htm). Also A: Heather Clish, Trustees of Reservations (YES on 6), FRC Media interview posted Sept 2026 (3:41-4:56, 15-member board and yearly report on every dollar; 5:31-6:51, grants to cities, towns, nonprofits and state agencies; 10:43-11:13, confident the Legislature will follow the voters).
5 / 5
Which matters more to you?
Sources (Ballot Question 6): A: argument in favor (oversight and annual reporting). B: majority report (constraints on administrative flexibility). Authors: Argument in favor by Mass Audubon; Argument against compiled by the Secretary of the Commonwealth from the Legislature's majority report (no organized No group). Special Joint Committee on Initiative Petitions majority report, pp. 32-33. Secretary of the Commonwealth, Information for Voters 2026, Question 6 pp. 16-17 (https://www.sec.state.ma.us/divisions/elections/research-and-statistics/information-for-voters-2026.htm). Also A: Heather Clish, Trustees of Reservations (YES on 6), FRC Media interview posted Sept 2026 (4:48-4:56, a report every year showing how every dollar was spent).
Candidates are still sending in answers, and more races are coming. We'll email you when your quizzes are ready, plus a reminder before Election Day.
Just your email and town. We never share or sell it to campaigns, parties or anyone else, and your quiz answers are never linked to it. Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy
Every answer is based on the official Information for Voters guide: the summary, the Legislature's reports and the arguments for and against.
New quizzes for your ballot, voting reminders, and from November a short, nonpartisan email on how your local boards and state legislators voted.
Just your email and town. Never shared or sold, and your quiz answers are never linked to it. Privacy