← Sudbury Select Board

Sudbury Select Board · 2020–2021 Board · Regular meeting

December 8, 2020

5 recorded votes, 0 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · Agenda

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Sudbury ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Janie W. Dretler, Jennifer S. Roberts, Daniel E. Carty, William J. Schineller, Charles G. Russo

Absent: None

Every vote, in order

The Sudbury Board of Selectmen votes in accordance with M.G.L., Ch. 40, Sec. 56, as amended, the

In accordance with M.G.L., Ch. 40, Sec. 56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne by each class of real and personal property, relative to setting the Fiscal Year 2021...

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Vice-Chair Roberts seconded the motion. Town Manager Hayes clarified the Board was ratifying the tax classification votes because at the time the Sudbury tax classification hearing was held (December 1), the MA Department of Revenue (DOR) had not provided confirmation of Town materials. The next day confirmation was provided by DOR, with no changes made. It was on motion 5-0; Roberts-aye, Russo-aye, Carty-aye, Schineller-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: In accordance with M.G.L., Ch. 40, Sec. 56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne by each class of real and personal property, relative to setting the Fiscal Year 2021 tax rates and sets the Residential Factor at 0.9752, with a corresponding CIP shift of 1.33. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020.

From the minutes

“Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Vice-Chair Roberts seconded the motion. Town Manager Hayes clarified the Board was ratifying the tax classification votes because at the time the Sudbury tax classification hearing was held (December 1), the MA Department of Revenue (DOR) had not provided confirmation of Town materials. The next day confirmation was provided by DOR, with no changes made. It was on motion 5-0; Roberts-aye, Russo-aye, Carty-aye, Schineller-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: In accordance with M.G.L., Ch. 40, Sec. 56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne by each class of real and personal property, relative to setting the Fiscal Year 2021 tax rates and sets the Residential Factor at 0.9752, with a corresponding CIP shift of 1.33. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020..” (Motion: Schineller, second: Roberts)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Vote not to adopt a Residential Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5C for Fiscal Year 2021. This

Not to adopt a Residential Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5C for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Selectman Russo seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Carty-aye, Russo-aye, Roberts-aye, Schineller-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: Not to adopt a Residential Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5C for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020.

From the minutes

“Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Selectman Russo seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Carty-aye, Russo-aye, Roberts-aye, Schineller-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: Not to adopt a Residential Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5C for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020..” (Motion: Schineller, second: Russo)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Not to adopt a Small Commercial Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5I for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Selectman Russo seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Russo-aye, Carty-aye, Schineller-aye, Roberts-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: Not to adopt a Small Commercial Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5I for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020.

From the minutes

“Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Selectman Russo seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Russo-aye, Carty-aye, Schineller-aye, Roberts-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: Not to adopt a Small Commercial Exemption pursuant to M.G.L. c. 59, § 5I for Fiscal Year 2021. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020..” (Motion: Schineller, second: Russo)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

In accordance with Chapter 169 of the Acts of 2012, the total Fiscal Year 2021 funding cap on exemptions granted by the Sudbury Means Tested Senior Tax Exemption Program shall be. 0.5115847% of...

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Vice-Chair Roberts seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Roberts-aye, Schineller-aye, Carty-aye, Russo-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: In accordance with Chapter 169 of the Acts of 2012, the total Fiscal Year 2021 funding cap on exemptions granted by the Sudbury Means Tested Senior Tax Exemption Program shall be. 0.5115847% of the FY 2021 Residential Property Tax Levy. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020.

From the minutes

“Selectman Schineller moved in the words of the motion. Vice-Chair Roberts seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Roberts-aye, Schineller-aye, Carty-aye, Russo-aye, Dretler-aye VOTED: In accordance with Chapter 169 of the Acts of 2012, the total Fiscal Year 2021 funding cap on exemptions granted by the Sudbury Means Tested Senior Tax Exemption Program shall be. 0.5115847% of the FY 2021 Residential Property Tax Levy. This motion serves to ratify and confirm the same vote taken on December 1, 2020..” (Motion: Schineller, second: Roberts)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Vote to adjourn meeting

Adjourn

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Selectman Russo motioned to adjourn the meeting. Selectman Schineller seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Russo-aye, Schineller-aye, Carty-aye, Roberts-aye, Dretler-aye. VOTED: To adjourn the meeting

From the minutes

“Selectman Russo motioned to adjourn the meeting. Selectman Schineller seconded the motion. It was on motion 5-0; Russo-aye, Schineller-aye, Carty-aye, Roberts-aye, Dretler-aye. VOTED: To adjourn the meeting.” (Motion: Russo, second: Schineller)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

From the Sudbury Select Board’s official minutes, posted on the town’s Select Board meetings page. We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos (the town’s website has no Select Board photos): League of Women Voters of Sudbury voters’ guides (candidate-supplied photos) — Charles Russo (2026), Radha Gargeya and Lisa Kouchakdjian (2025), Janie Dretler and Daniel Carty (2024). Cropped by MassVoter. Former members show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.