← Stoneham Select Board

Stoneham Select Board · 2025–2026 Board · Regular meeting

May 9, 2025

3 recorded votes, 1 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · Agenda

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Stoneham ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Timothy Waitkevitch, David Pignone, Ryan Foreman, Heidi Bilbo, Raymie Parker

Absent: None

Every vote, in order

Call to Order

Open the meeting

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Waitkevitch called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. with a unanimous roll call vote

From the minutes

“Waitkevitch called the meeting to order at 8:30 a.m. with a unanimous roll call vote.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Override Ballot

Move the override ballot date from 6/14 to a date to be determined in the fall

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · 4–1

Parker moved to move the override ballot date from 6/14 to a date to be determined in the fall. Bilbo seconded the motion. Foreman stated that it was not his intention to invade the province of the School Committee in any way. He stated that $2.1 million plus $900,000 is very close to the $3.1 million discussed last night at the School Committee meeting. Parker stated that this is not an emergency. Clearly we have forced the School Committee to show its hand and we have forced this staff to work tirelessly. Pignone stated that it is not emergent, but it is urgent. Bilbo stated that the confusion is from the timing and the inability to have follow-up conversations. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in favor: Timothy Waitkevitch David Pignone Heidi Bilbo Raymie Parker Voting against: Ryan Foreman Motion Passes (4-1)

Yes: Bilbo, Parker, Pignone, WaitkevitchNo: Foreman

From the minutes

“Parker moved to move the override ballot date from 6/14 to a date to be determined in the fall. Bilbo seconded the motion. Foreman stated that it was not his intention to invade the province of the School Committee in any way. He stated that $2.1 million plus $900,000 is very close to the $3.1 million discussed last night at the School Committee meeting. Parker stated that this is not an emergency. Clearly we have forced the School Committee to show its hand and we have forced this staff to work tirelessly. Pignone stated that it is not emergent, but it is urgent. Bilbo stated that the confusion is from the timing and the inability to have follow-up conversations. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in favor: Timothy Waitkevitch David Pignone Heidi Bilbo Raymie Parker Voting against: Ryan Foreman Motion Passes (4-1).” (Motion: Parker, second: Bilbo)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Adjourn

Adjourn

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Parker moved to adjourn. Pignone seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in favor: Timothy Waitkevitch David Pignone Ryan Foreman Heidi Bilbo Raymie Parker Motion passes (5-0)

From the minutes

“Parker moved to adjourn. Pignone seconded the motion. A roll call vote was taken. Voting in favor: Timothy Waitkevitch David Pignone Ryan Foreman Heidi Bilbo Raymie Parker Motion passes (5-0).” (Motion: Parker, second: Pignone)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

From the Stoneham Select Board’s official minutes, posted in the town’s Agenda Center (Select Board). We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos: Town of Stoneham, Select Board page (captioned group photo). Cropped by MassVoter. Former members show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.