← Reading Select Board

Reading Select Board · 2021–2022 Board · Regular meeting

June 9, 2021

3 recorded votes, 1 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · Agenda

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Reading ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Mark Dockser, Karen Gately Herrick, Carlo Bacci, Anne Landry, Chris Haley

Absent: None

Every vote, in order

Votes that Lowell House is a suitable tenant to operate a licensed substance abuse treatment program at 59 Middlesex Avenue, Reading MA

Minutes, page 3

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Mark Dockser moved that the Select Board votes that Lowell House is a suitable tenant to operate a licensed substance abuse treatment program at 59 Middlesex Avenue, Reading MA. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci and approved with a unanimous roll call vote.

From the minutes

“Mark Dockser moved that the Select Board votes that Lowell House is a suitable tenant to operate a licensed substance abuse treatment program at 59 Middlesex Avenue, Reading MA. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci and approved with a unanimous roll call vote..” (Motion: Dockser, second: Bacci)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Approve the Pride Month resolution as presented

Minutes, page 3

Adopt resolutionPassed · Unanimous, 5 present

Mark Dockser moved to approve the Pride Month resolution as presented. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci and approved with a unanimous roll call vote.

From the minutes

“Mark Dockser moved to approve the Pride Month resolution as presented. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci and approved with a unanimous roll call vote..” (Motion: Dockser, second: Bacci)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Go into Executive Session including staff members Bob LeLacheur and Caitlin Nocella and Counsel Ivria Fried, pursuant to Executive Session Purpose 2 and Purpose 3, to vote to approve Collective...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · 3–2

Mark Dockser moved to go into Executive Session including staff members Bob LeLacheur and Caitlin Nocella and Counsel Ivria Fried, pursuant to Executive Session Purpose 2 and Purpose 3, to vote to approve Collective Bargaining Agreements( Reading Facilities Maintenance Workers and Town Custodians- AFSCME Council 93, Local 1703; Public Works Supervisory Union, AFSCME Council 93, Local 1703), and that the Select Board Chair declare that an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the body, and, pursuant to Executive Session Purpose 1, to discuss an Open Meeting Law complaint filed against the Select Board by Walter Tuvell, and to reconvene in Open Session after the executive session. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci. Before the board voted, Chris Haley asked why the board discussed this in open session last week but we are moving it to executive session this time. He also asked why the texts he provided were not included in the packet. He noted he is very concerned doing this in executive session and not being transparent. Carlo Bacci agreed noting he feels this should be done in open session as well, however the other members disagreed. Counsel also felt from a legal perspective this should continue in executive session. She indicated that her legal advice to boards is always to address Open Meeting Law complaints in executive session. The board took a vote on the motion to go into executive session and was approved with the following roll

Yes: Dockser, Herrick, LandryNo: Bacci, Haley

From the minutes

“Mark Dockser moved to go into Executive Session including staff members Bob LeLacheur and Caitlin Nocella and Counsel Ivria Fried, pursuant to Executive Session Purpose 2 and Purpose 3, to vote to approve Collective Bargaining Agreements( Reading Facilities Maintenance Workers and Town Custodians- AFSCME Council 93, Local 1703; Public Works Supervisory Union, AFSCME Council 93, Local 1703), and that the Select Board Chair declare that an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the bargaining position of the body, and, pursuant to Executive Session Purpose 1, to discuss an Open Meeting Law complaint filed against the Select Board by Walter Tuvell, and to reconvene in Open Session after the executive session. The motion was seconded by Carlo Bacci. Before the board voted, Chris Haley asked why the board discussed this in open session last week but we are moving it to executive session this time. He also asked why the texts he provided were not included in the packet. He noted he is very concerned doing this in executive session and not being transparent. Carlo Bacci agreed noting he feels this should be done in open session as well, however the other members disagreed. Counsel also felt from a legal perspective this should continue in executive session. She indicated that her legal advice to boards is always to address Open Meeting Law complaints in executive session. The board took a vote on the motion to go into executive session and was approved with the following roll call vote: Dockser-yes; Haley- no; Bacci- no; Landry-yes; Herrick- yes..” (Motion: Dockser, second: Bacci)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

From the Reading Select Board’s official minutes, posted in the town’s Public Records Archive (Minutes > Select Board). We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos: Reading Patch candidate profiles, courtesy of the candidates (Melissa Murphy, Karen Gately Herrick, Chris Haley), and The Reading Post candidacy announcements (Karen Rose-Gillis, Sal Bramante). The town’s website has no member photos.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.