MassVoter.com← Newton City CouncilNewton City Council · 2018–2019 Council · Special meeting
11 recorded votes, 8 with disagreement.
Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · City meeting page
A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.
Note on these minutes: Special meeting.
Present: Alison M. Leary, Maria Scibelli Greenberg, Susan Albright, Jake Auchincloss, Emily Norton, Andrea W. Kelley, James R. Cote, Barbara Brousal-Glaser, Joshua Krintzman, Leonard J. Gentile, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Andreae Downs, Deborah J. Crossley, John B. Rice, Greg Schwartz, Victoria L. Danberg, Brenda Noel, Rebecca Walker Grossman, Marc C. Laredo, Lisle Baker, David A. Kalis
Absent: Allan L. Ciccone, Richard A. Lipof, Cheryl Lipof Lappin
#468-18 Amend the item by replacing the ballot question language with the following: Shall the City adopt the following zoning ordinance? The...
A motion to amend the item by replacing the ballot question language with the following: Shall the City adopt the following zoning ordinance? The number of recreational marijuana retail establishments shall be not fewer than two (2) nor more than four (4) establishments set by a general ordinance adopted by the City Council notwithstanding M.G.L. Chapter 94 G, Sec 3(a)(2)(ii).” was approved by voice vote.
The Actions record this as a voice vote with no count, so MassVoter shows the result only.
“A motion to amend the item by replacing the ballot question language with the following: Shall the City adopt the following zoning ordinance? The number of recreational marijuana retail establishments shall be not fewer than two (2) nor more than four (4) establishments set by a general ordinance adopted by the City Council notwithstanding M.G.L. Chapter 94 G, Sec 3(a)(2)(ii).” was approved by voice vote..”
#468-18 Amend the language to the following: Shall Newton adopt the following zoning ordinance: If there is no general ordinance prohibiting...
Motion to amend the language to the following: Shall Newton adopt the following zoning ordinance: If there is no general ordinance prohibiting retail recreational marijuana establishments from operating in the City of Newton, the number of recreational marijuana retail establishments allowed to operate shall be not fewer than two (2) nor more than four (4) establishments set by a general ordinance adopted by the City Council notwithstanding M. G. L. chapter 94G, Sec. 3(a)(2)(ii). Failed to Carry 11 Nays (Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Noel), 10 yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kalis, Kelley, Markiewicz, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
Yes: Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kalis, Kelley, Laredo, Markiewicz, Norton, Rice, SchwartzNo: Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Noel
“Motion to amend the language to the following: Shall Newton adopt the following zoning ordinance: If there is no general ordinance prohibiting retail recreational marijuana establishments from operating in the City of Newton, the number of recreational marijuana retail establishments allowed to operate shall be not fewer than two (2) nor more than four (4) establishments set by a general ordinance adopted by the City Council notwithstanding M. G. L. chapter 94G, Sec. 3(a)(2)(ii). Failed to Carry 11 Nays (Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Noel), 10 yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kalis, Kelley, Markiewicz, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#468-18 Remove Question from Ballot: Remove ballot question to limit the number of recreational marijuana establishments
Motion to remove Question from Ballot Failed to Carry 11 Nays (Albright, Brousal- Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 10 yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Gentile, Kalis, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
Yes: Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Gentile, Kalis, Kelley, Laredo, Norton, Rice, SchwartzNo: Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel
“Motion to remove Question from Ballot Failed to Carry 11 Nays (Albright, Brousal- Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Greenberg, Grossman, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 10 yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Gentile, Kalis, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#469-18 Approve: Place a question on the ballot to prohibit retail recreational marijuana establishments
Approved 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
“Approved 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#470-18 No action necessary: Ballot question prohibiting recreational marijuana establishments with exceptions
No Action Necessary 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
“No Action Necessary 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#471-18 Substitute the following text: “that if more than one question passes, the question that bans all recreational marijuana retail...
Motion to substitute the following text: “that if more than one question passes, the question that bans all recreational marijuana retail establishments will prevail. Failed to Carry 13 Nays (Councilors Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 8 Yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
Yes: Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Laredo, Norton, Rice, SchwartzNo: Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel
“Motion to substitute the following text: “that if more than one question passes, the question that bans all recreational marijuana retail establishments will prevail. Failed to Carry 13 Nays (Councilors Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 8 Yeas (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#471-18 Approve the Programs & Services text: Means to determine which marijuana question prevails if both are approved
Approved the Programs & Services text 13 Yeas (Councilors Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 8 Nays (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
Yes: Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, NoelNo: Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Laredo, Norton, Rice, Schwartz
“Approved the Programs & Services text 13 Yeas (Councilors Albright, Brousal-Glaser, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Gentile, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Krintzman, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel), 8 Nays (Councilors Auchincloss, Baker, Cote, Kelley, Norton, Rice, Schwartz, Laredo), 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#441-18 Approve: Set the date of November 6, 2018 for a Special Municipal Election
Approved 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof)
“Approved 21 Yeas, 3 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Lappin and Lipof).”
#476-18 Question 1 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary: Proposed ballot questions re recreational marijuana retail establishments
Question 1 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary
The Actions record this as a voice vote with no count, so MassVoter shows the result only.
“Question 1 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary.”
#476-18 Question 3 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary: Proposed ballot questions re recreational marijuana retail establishments
Question 3 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary
The Actions record this as a voice vote with no count, so MassVoter shows the result only.
“Question 3 Voice Vote Approved No Action Necessary.”
#476-18 Approve: Proposed ballot questions re recreational marijuana retail establishments
Council. Approved 20 Yeas, 4 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Gentile, Lappin and Lipof)
Yes: Albright, Auchincloss, Baker, Brousal-Glaser, Cote, Crossley, Danberg, Downs, Greenberg, Grossman, Kalis, Kelley, Krintzman, Laredo, Leary, Markiewicz, Noel, Norton, Rice, SchwartzThe Actions name Leonard J. Gentile as absent for this vote, though listed present at the top of the Actions; left out of this vote.
“Council. Approved 20 Yeas, 4 Absent (Councilors Ciccone, Gentile, Lappin and Lipof).”
From the Newton City Council’s official record of each meeting, the “City Council Actions,” posted by the City Clerk on the city’s Council Meetings page (older years on its archives page). We check every vote against the councilors present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Councilor photos: City of Newton (newtonma.gov), from each councilor’s official page. John Oliver, Rena Getz and Brian Golden: Fig City News. Cyrus Dahmubed, Brittany Hume Charm, Sean Roche, Lisa Gordon and Jacob Silber: League of Women Voters of Newton 2025 candidate guide. Julie Irish: her campaign website. Former councilors show initials.
How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →