← Marlborough City Council

Marlborough City Council · 2022–2023 Council · Regular meeting

December 4, 2023

33 recorded votes, 33 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · City meeting page

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Marlborough ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Mark A. Oram, Michael H. Ossing, Samantha Perlman, Kathleen D. Robey, Laura J. Wagner, David Doucette, Christian Dumais, Teona C. Brown, John J. Irish, Sean A. Navin, Donald R. Landers

Absent: None

Every vote, in order

Accept and file: Minutes of the City Council meeting, NOVEMBER 27, 2023

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Minutes of the City Council meeting, NOVEMBER 27, 2023, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Minutes of the City Council meeting, NOVEMBER 27, 2023, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Dumais)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Close the public hearing: Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial...

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

That the PUBLIC HEARING on the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial Drive beginning at a point approximately 350’ north/northwest of the centerline of the intersection of Nickerson Road for new commercial service at 1000 Nickerson Road, Order No. 23- 1009015, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:03 PM., all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:10 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“That the PUBLIC HEARING on the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial Drive beginning at a point approximately 350’ north/northwest of the centerline of the intersection of Nickerson Road for new commercial service at 1000 Nickerson Road, Order No. 23- 1009015, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:03 PM., all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:10 PM; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Suspend the rules to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009015

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – Motion by Councilor Landers to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009015 – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – Motion by Councilor Landers to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009015 – granted..” (Motion: Landers)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Approve with conditions: Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial...

Minutes, page 1

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Landers, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial Drive beginning at a point approximately 350’ north/northwest of the centerline of the intersection of Nickerson Road for new commercial service at 1000 Nickerson Road, be and is herewith APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Landers, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole (25-25) on Hayes Memorial Drive beginning at a point approximately 350’ north/northwest of the centerline of the intersection of Nickerson Road for new commercial service at 1000 Nickerson Road, be and is herewith APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS; adopted..” (Motion: Landers)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Close the public hearing: Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive...

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

That the PUBLIC HEARING on the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive beginning at a point approximately 50’ southeast of the centerline of the intersection of Simarano Drive and Bay Drive installing a midspan pole between pole 10 and pole 8-50 and install a 900 KVAR on it, Order No. 23-1009016, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:06 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“That the PUBLIC HEARING on the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive beginning at a point approximately 50’ southeast of the centerline of the intersection of Simarano Drive and Bay Drive installing a midspan pole between pole 10 and pole 8-50 and install a 900 KVAR on it, Order No. 23-1009016, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:06 PM; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Suspend the rules to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009016

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – Motion by Councilor Landers to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009016 – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – Motion by Councilor Landers to remove from the Public Services Committee, Order No. 23-1009016 – granted..” (Motion: Landers)

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Approve with conditions: Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive beginning...

Minutes, page 2

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Landers, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive beginning at a point approximately 50’ southeast of the centerline of the intersection of Simarano Drive and Bay Drive installing a midspan pole between pole 10 and pole 8-50 and install a 900 KVAR on it, be and is herewith APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Landers, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Petition from Massachusetts Electric and Verizon New England, to install one Joint Owned Pole on Simarano Drive beginning at a point approximately 50’ southeast of the centerline of the intersection of Simarano Drive and Bay Drive installing a midspan pole between pole 10 and pole 8-50 and install a 900 KVAR on it, be and is herewith APPROVED WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS; adopted..” (Motion: Landers)

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Approve: Transfer Request in the amount of $51,600.00 (Fifty-one thousand, six hundred dollars) which moves funds from Sale of Graves to Reduce...

Minutes, page 3

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $51,600.00 (Fifty-one thousand, six hundred dollars) which moves funds from Sale of Graves to Reduce the FY 2024 Tax Levy, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $51,600.00 (Fifty-one thousand, six hundred dollars) which moves funds from Sale of Graves to Reduce the FY 2024 Tax Levy, APPROVED; adopted..” (Motion: Irish)

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Approve: Transfer Request in the amount of $564,579.15 (Five hundred sixty-four thousand, five hundred seventy-nine dollars & fifteen cents) which...

Minutes, page 4

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $564,579.15 (Five hundred sixty-four thousand, five hundred seventy-nine dollars & fifteen cents) which moves funds from Overlay Reserve to Reduce the FY 2024 Tax Levy, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $564,579.15 (Five hundred sixty-four thousand, five hundred seventy-nine dollars & fifteen cents) which moves funds from Overlay Reserve to Reduce the FY 2024 Tax Levy, APPROVED; adopted..” (Motion: Irish)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Approve: Marlborough City Council votes in accordance with MGL Chapter 40, §56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne...

Minutes, page 4

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Marlborough City Council votes in accordance with MGL Chapter 40, §56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne by each class of real and personal property, relative to setting the Fiscal Year 2024 tax rates and set the Residential Factor at 0.8346 with a corresponding CIP shift of 1.44 pending approval of the City’s annual tax recap by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Marlborough City Council votes in accordance with MGL Chapter 40, §56, as amended, the percentage of local tax levy which will be borne by each class of real and personal property, relative to setting the Fiscal Year 2024 tax rates and set the Residential Factor at 0.8346 with a corresponding CIP shift of 1.44 pending approval of the City’s annual tax recap by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue, APPROVED; adopted..” (Motion: Irish)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Approve: Gift Acceptance in the amount of $2,000.00 from the Mobile Home Village Association, awarded to the Council on Aging to be used to...

Minutes, page 4

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Gift Acceptance in the amount of $2,000.00 from the Mobile Home Village Association, awarded to the Council on Aging to be used to purchase new equipment and games for the card room at the Senior Center; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Gift Acceptance in the amount of $2,000.00 from the Mobile Home Village Association, awarded to the Council on Aging to be used to purchase new equipment and games for the card room at the Senior Center; adopted..” (Motion: Irish)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Refer to the Finance Committee: Transfer Request in the amount of $2,000,000.00 (two million dollars) which moves funds from Undesignated Fund...

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $2,000,000.00 (two million dollars) which moves funds from Undesignated Fund (Free Cash) to Richer School Feasibility Study Fund to be used for the feasibility study phase of the MA School Building Authority’s (MSBA) process, referred to the FINANCE COMMITTEE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Irish, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $2,000,000.00 (two million dollars) which moves funds from Undesignated Fund (Free Cash) to Richer School Feasibility Study Fund to be used for the feasibility study phase of the MA School Building Authority’s (MSBA) process, referred to the FINANCE COMMITTEE; adopted..” (Motion: Irish)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Approve: Reappointment of Christopher J. Firicano as City Collector/Assistant Finance Director for a two-year term to expire on November 23, 2025

Minutes, page 5

Confirm appointmentPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Reappointment of Christopher J. Firicano as City Collector/Assistant Finance Director for a two-year term to expire on November 23, 2025, APPROVED, adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Reappointment of Christopher J. Firicano as City Collector/Assistant Finance Director for a two-year term to expire on November 23, 2025, APPROVED, adopted..” (Motion: Dumais)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Moved to the end of agenda & file: Communication from City Solicitor Jason Grossfield, re: Request for Executive Session to discuss litigation...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor Jason Grossfield, re: Request for Executive Session to discuss litigation strategy relative to JW Capital Partners, LLC and Marlborough TOTG LLC v. City of Marlborough (Land Court No. 23 MISC 000199), MOVED TO THE END OF AGENDA & FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor Jason Grossfield, re: Request for Executive Session to discuss litigation strategy relative to JW Capital Partners, LLC and Marlborough TOTG LLC v. City of Marlborough (Land Court No. 23 MISC 000199), MOVED TO THE END OF AGENDA & FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Moved to item #16 & file: Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” of...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” of the Code relative to Definitions, Affordable Housing, and the Marlborough Village District (MV), in proper legal form, Order No. 22/23-1008721K, MOVED TO ITEM #16 & FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” of the Code relative to Definitions, Affordable Housing, and the Marlborough Village District (MV), in proper legal form, Order No. 22/23-1008721K, MOVED TO ITEM #16 & FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from the Planning Board, re: Negative Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Negative Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts” to include Map 39, Parcels 5 and 26B located on Robin Hill Street, Order No. 23-1008964, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Negative Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts” to include Map 39, Parcels 5 and 26B located on Robin Hill Street, Order No. 23-1008964, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from property owner, re: Opposition to the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from property owner, re: Opposition to the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts”, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from property owner, re: Opposition to the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts”, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from residents, re: Opposition to Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from residents, re: Opposition to Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from residents, re: Opposition to Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes of following Boards, Commissions and Committees

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Doucette, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Minutes of following Boards, Commissions and Committees, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Doucette, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Minutes of following Boards, Commissions and Committees, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Doucette)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Refer to the Legal Department: Following CLAIMS

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Perlman, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the following CLAIMS, referred to the LEGAL DEPARTMENT; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Perlman, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the following CLAIMS, referred to the LEGAL DEPARTMENT; adopted..” (Motion: Perlman)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from the Marlborough Regional Chamber of Commerce (MRCC), re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from the Marlborough Regional Chamber of Commerce (MRCC), re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” of the Code relative to Definitions, Affordable Housing, and the Marlborough Village District (MV), Order No. 22/23-1008721, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from the Marlborough Regional Chamber of Commerce (MRCC), re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” of the Code relative to Definitions, Affordable Housing, and the Marlborough Village District (MV), Order No. 22/23-1008721, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 6

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Approve: Communication from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of Pulte Homes of New England LLC and on behalf of property owner Denali Belle LLC, re...

Minutes, page 6

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of Pulte Homes of New England LLC and on behalf of property owner Denali Belle LLC, re: Request to Withdraw Without Prejudice, the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts”, Order No. 23-1008964, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of Pulte Homes of New England LLC and on behalf of property owner Denali Belle LLC, re: Request to Withdraw Without Prejudice, the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 “Zoning” to amend §22 “Retirement Community Overlay Districts”, Order No. 23-1008964, APPROVED; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 6

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Approve: Communication from Attorney Gemma Cashman on behalf of Trammell Crow Company and on behalf of property owner Boston Scientific, re...

Minutes, page 6

Adopt orderPassed · 6–5

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from Attorney Gemma Cashman on behalf of Trammell Crow Company and on behalf of property owner Boston Scientific, re: Request to Withdraw Without Prejudice, the Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, Order No. 23-1008941, APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 6 – Nay: 5 Yea: Wagner, Dumais, Brown, Irish, Landers, Ossing. Nay: Doucette, Navin, Oram, Perlman, Robey.

Yes: Brown, Dumais, Irish, Landers, Ossing, WagnerNo: Doucette, Navin, Oram, Perlman, Robey

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from Attorney Gemma Cashman on behalf of Trammell Crow Company and on behalf of property owner Boston Scientific, re: Request to Withdraw Without Prejudice, the Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, Order No. 23-1008941, APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 6 – Nay: 5 Yea: Wagner, Dumais, Brown, Irish, Landers, Ossing. Nay: Doucette, Navin, Oram, Perlman, Robey..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 6

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.

The minutes record the result only (“granted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new...

Minutes, page 6

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, in proper legal form, Order No. 23- 1008941, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Jason Grossfield, re: Proposed Amendment to City Code, Chapter 650 “Zoning” by adding a new section to create the “Sasseville Way Residential Overlay District”, in proper legal form, Order No. 23- 1008941, FILE; adopted..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 6 (PDF)

Approve: THAT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 OF CHAPTER 40A OF THE GENERAL LAWS, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH THAT...

Minutes, page 9

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: THAT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 OF CHAPTER 40A OF THE GENERAL LAWS, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH THAT CHAPTER 650 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS MOST RECENTLY AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: I. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-5 (Definitions; word usage), Subsection B, by inserting a new definition for “Area Median Income (AMI)” and “Eligible Household”, and amending the existing definition for “Mixed Use”, to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): AREA MEDIAN INCOME (AMI) The Housing Area Median Family Income set forth in or calculated from regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the Housing Act of 1937, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, determined annually for the Metropolitan Statistical Area that includes the City of Marlborough and adjusted for family size. ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD A household whose gross household income does not exceed the corresponding percentage of AMI specified in Section 650-26. MIXED USE (1) A combination of permitted (Y) or special permit (SP) residential/business uses as listed in §650-17, Table of Use Regulations, for a particular zoning district, located on the same lot and arranged vertically in multiple stories of a structure or horizontally adjacent to...

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Landers opposed.”

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: THAT, PURSUANT TO SECTION 5 OF CHAPTER 40A OF THE GENERAL LAWS, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH THAT CHAPTER 650 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS MOST RECENTLY AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: I. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-5 (Definitions; word usage), Subsection B, by inserting a new definition for “Area Median Income (AMI)” and “Eligible Household”, and amending the existing definition for “Mixed Use”, to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): AREA MEDIAN INCOME (AMI) The Housing Area Median Family Income set forth in or calculated from regulations promulgated by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development pursuant to Section 8 of the Housing Act of 1937, as amended by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, determined annually for the Metropolitan Statistical Area that includes the City of Marlborough and adjusted for family size. ELIGIBLE HOUSEHOLD A household whose gross household income does not exceed the corresponding percentage of AMI specified in Section 650-26. MIXED USE (1) A combination of permitted (Y) or special permit (SP) residential/business uses as listed in §650-17, Table of Use Regulations, for a particular zoning district, located on the same lot and arranged vertically in multiple stories of a structure or horizontally adjacent to one another in one or more buildings. (2) The To achieve a mix of residential to business uses, such as retail or restaurant, -uses shall be that is balanced and compatible, and shall contribute to a vibrant downtown atmosphere, including a combination of ground floor street front uses, such as retail or restaurant. (3) Gground floors of buildings fronting streets or public accessways shall be reserved for restricted to nonresidential public business/commercial uses, except as specified below: Dwelling units shall be allowed on ground floors of a buildings if: (a) The building that is set behind another a mixed-use building that has business commercial uses on the ground floor and residential on other floors so long as the building set behind does not face a public way.: or (b)The residential portion of the ground floor of a building is set behind street front nonresidential uses within the same building. II. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-17 (Table of Uses), by striking “Y” and replacing it with “SP” for the following specific uses, in the MV zoning district, to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): Zoning District Abbreviations Business Use RR A A A R R R N B C L I MV Ways - - - B C C B A I ide 1 2 3 R Hotels (41) N N N N N N N S S S S S Y N P P P P P SP Hotels with N N N N N N N N S S S S Y N conference P P P P SP facilities and commercial uses (21) Mixed-Use N N N N N N N S S N N N Y SP Development P P SP (42) III. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-18 (Conditions for uses), Subsection A, paragraphs 41 and 42, as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): (41) Hotels within the Marlborough Village District are by rightspecial permit, and subject to site plan approval by the City Council with input from department staff who participate in administrative site plan review as provided under § 270-2. See in § 650-34B special provisions for site plan review by City Council of hotels in the Marlborough Village District. (42) Mixed-use development, including multifamily residential uses, shall not be subject to special permit provisions for multifamily uses. In the Wayside District, multifamily dwelling shall be allowed only as part of a mixed-use development. Mixed-use development may include vertically mixed uses in a single building or horizontally mixed uses in which multiple buildings create the mix of uses on a single parcel. Each individual building may include a single use with multiple uses occurring next to each other and within multiple buildings on the single parcel. IV. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-26 (Affordable Housing), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): § 650-26. Affordable housing. The purpose of this section is to provide that multifamily uses include an affordable component to ensure the city remains above the state’s required inventory of affordable units. A. This section 650-26 shall apply to all developments that result in or contain eight (8) or more dwelling units, in all zoning districts, for the following types of uses: multifamily dwelling(s) or mixed-use development containing multifamily dwelling(s). This section shall apply as set forth above unless an exception is otherwise stated in this section 650-26. Compliance with this section shall be made a condition of any special permit that is required for the development. All special permits granted to applicants to construct multifamily dwellings, or mixed-use development containing multifamily dwelling(s), thereby increasing the number or density of residential dwellings to a number or level greater than that allowable as a matter of right under the zoning classification for the subject parcel shall require the following. (1) Developments of 20 8 or more units. (a) Number of on-site affordable units. The A development subject to this section 650-26 shall i) provide that at least 125% of the dwelling units to be constructed for homeownership or rental purposes will be made available at affordable prices to eligible home buyers or renters, or ii) if authorized by a majority of the City Council, provide a sum not less than $50,000 per affordable dwelling unit that would have been required in Item i) above to be deposited as directed by the City Council into the fund for economic development created by Chapter 126 of the Acts of 2011 or into another fund designated by the City Council. If when applying the specified percentage to the total number of units to determine the required number of affordable units, the resulting number of affordable units includes a fraction of a unit, this fraction, if equal to or over one-half, shall be rounded up to the next whole number. . (b) Eligibility for affordable units. All affordable units must be eligible for inclusion on the state’s Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI). The affordable units shall be available to households at no more than eighty percent (80%) of AMI in accordance with SHI requirements. After initial occupancy, the gross household income of an eligible household shall be verified annually to determine continued eligibility and rent. (bc) Local preference. The development plan shall provide that all legally permissible efforts shall be made to provide 70% of the affordable dwelling units to eligible residents of the City of Marlborough. (dc) Distribution of affordable units. Dwelling units to be sold or rented at affordable prices shall be integrated into the overall development to prevent physical segregation of such units. (ed) Appearance. The exterior of the affordable units shall be designed to be compatible with and as nearly indistinguishable from the market rate units as possible. (fe) Minimum and maximum floor areas. Affordable housing units shall have a gross floor area not less than the minimum required by the State Department of Housing and Community Development under the regulations created under the authority of MGL Chapter 40B. (gf) Period of affordability. Limitations and safeguards shall be imposed to ensure the continued availability of the designated affordable units for a minimum of 99 years or in perpetuity. Such limitations and safeguards may be in the form of deed restrictions, resale monitoring, requirements for income verification of purchasers and/or tenants, rent level controls and the like. (hg) Limitation on change in affordability. In no event shall any change in affordability occur if the minimum percentage of affordable units required in the entire City under MGL Chapter 40B has either not been met at that time or such change in affordability would cause the City to fall below that percentage. (ih) Staging of affordable and market-rate units. No more than 50% of the building permits for the market-rate units shall be issued until construction has commenced on 30% of the affordable units. No more than 50% of the occupancy permits for the market-rate units shall be issued until 30% of the occupancy permits for the affordable units have been issued. The City Council may modify this provision for developments under 50 units. (i) Alternate site. The City Council may allow the developer to build some or all of the affordable housing required by Subsection A(l)(a) on an alternate site 1.within the City, provided that the City Council determines that this is in the best interest of the City and orders that this specific condition be attached to the special permit. The location of the alternate site shall either be specified at the time of approval for the special permit or selected within six months of said application and shall then be subject to approval by the Housing Partnership Committee or its successor, by the City Council if otherwise required by this Zoning Ordinance and by any other proper authority as may be required by law. The development of the alternate site shall comply with Subsection A(l)(b), (e), (f), (g), (h) and (i) of this section, and the staging of development on the alternate site shall be governed by Subsection A(1)(h) applied to all units on both the main and alternate sites. (j) Guaranty of performance. No final certificate of occupancy shall be issued for any unit within a development subject to this section until all actions necessary to preserve the affordability of the affordable units in compliance with this section and include the affordable units on the subsidized housing inventory, including without limitation, a deed restriction, regulatory agreement and declaration of restrictive covenants, and/or any other restrictive instrument necessary, and all other required documentation, have been executed and registered or recorded by the developer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. The City Council shall require security in a form satisfactory to the City Council and City Solicitor to guarantee performance, including preservation of affordability, under this subsection, and no building permit shall be issued until and unless said security has been provided. (2) Developments of 19 or fewer units. All provisions of Subsection A(1) above applicable to 20 or more units may also be applied to developments of 19 or fewer units as the City Council finds practical. (32) The provisions of this section shall not apply to a special permit for an existing retirement community, or the expansion of an existing retirement community as governed by §§ 650-21 and 650-22. This subsection will be effective pursuant to the applicable provisions of Chapter 40A of the General Laws. (4) The provisions of this section shall not apply to projects which are granted special permits within the Marlborough Village District. V. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(D)(1), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): D. Design standards. (1) The purpose of the following design standards is to promote quality development emphasizing the City's sense of history and desire for contextual, pedestrian-scaled projects. Supporting streamlined development review, design standards are integral to the Marlborough Village District regulations and must be met as part of any special permit and/or site plan review and approval. (a) Nonmandatory In addition to the design standards, in connection with a special permit and/or site plan application in the Marlborough Village District, such applications shall be reviewed with respect to the Ddesign Review gGuidelines for the Marlborough Village District. which The guidelines will complement the design standards of this section and which will provide a guide to the desired appearance and quality of design in the Marlborough Village District. The guidelines are will be available at the Building Department and/or on the official website of the City. VI. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(D)(2), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): (2) All special permit and/or site plan review and approval applications in the Marlborough Village District shall be subject to the following design standards: VII. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), by inserting a new Section 650-34(D)(2)(a)[4], to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): [4] Facade step back. A step back in the facade of a building shall occur at the upper floor(s) for all buildings above three stories in height. For example, the fourth story of a four-story building shall be recessed from the lower three stories of the primary facade with a step back. Five feet shall be the minimum step back. VIII. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(D)(2)(d), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): (d) External materials and appearance. [1] Predominant wall materials for all ground floors shall be brick in traditional New England colors and character, and stone. shall be red brick, stone, or precast concrete panels; wWood siding may be used where the structures are adjacent to residential districts where the intent is to blend the structure more into the existing neighborhood. Thin brick veneer, precast concrete panel finished to look like brick or stone, masonry brick panels, and Flexbrick (or a similar product) can be used on upper floors. Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete (GFRC) panels (or something similar) can be used for a curtain wall (non-load bearing) exterior wall cladding. If painted, or coated, a nonmetallic finish is to be used. Cladding materials should be consistent on all facades with the exception of special design elements, such as turrets. Materials designed to imitate brick, e.g., faux brick, are not permitted. [2] The standards for all acceptable masonry construction are as follows: [a] Acceptable masonry construction for bricks will be of standard, fired clay, brick units bonded together with mortar. Acceptable applications include building components, such as walls, stairs, columns, arches, planter beds, etc. [b] Utilize bBricks which areshould be sound, hard, well-burnt with uniform color, shape and size. [c] The bricks should be compact, homogeneous, free from holes, cracks, flaws, air-bubbles, spawls and stone lumps. [d] Frogged bricks shall be laid with the frogs pointing upwards. [e] Mortar specifications shall comply with relative ASTM International standards. [f] The properties of all other masonry units shall comply with the requirements of relevant ASTM International standards. These include concrete masonry, stone masonry and composite masonry.Masonry units are classified into the following types: solid, hollow unit, cellular, perforated and frogged. IX. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(E)(1)(a)[2], to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): [2] Spaces in city-owned public garages and lots within 1,000 feet of the development can be counted to fulfill the required spaces, with payment-in-lieu required. X. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(E)(1)(b)[1], to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): [1] Eliminate parking minimums per the existing off-street parking (§650-48) unless the use is part of a mixed-use development where off-street parking would be determined during the special permit and/or site plan review process. XI. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(E)(2), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): (2) Payment in lieu of parking. In the Marlborough Village District, any new commercial or mixed use structure that is required to provide parking spaces may request to make payments to the City of Marlborough in lieu of providing for all or part of the on-site required parking, not to exceed twenty percent (20%) of the required on-site parking spaces. If when applying the specified percentage to determine the maximum number of on-site parking spaces which may be subject to payment-in-lieu, the resulting number includes a fraction of a unit, this fraction, if equal to or over one-half, shall be rounded up to the next whole number. . (a) Payment made to the City of Marlborough in lieu of providing some or all of the required off-street parking spaces for a project in the Marlborough Village District (MV) shall may only be allowed by right, subject to site plan and design reviewauthorized by special permit, in parking spaces designated for overnight parking, and subject to conditions set forth by special permit. (b) A one-time fee to be paid shall be $2510,000 (twenty-five thousand dollars) per parking space, which shall be paid prior to the receipt of an occupancy permit. XII. By deleting Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(E)(3), (Additional reduction in parking requirements). XIII. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-34(F), to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): F. Heights of structures. (1) To encourage redevelopment and reuse of parcels within the Marlborough Village District, minimum and maximum heights are established. Minimum heights shall be 35 feet or 2.5 stories; maximum height is 60 feet or 4 stories. six stories and up to 70 feet except for where a proposed structure is within 50 feet of a residential district boundary, where the height limit shall be 52 feet. By grant of a special permit, maximum building height; including building areas within 50 feet of a residential district boundary, may be increased to seven stories and up to 85 feet. Height limits do not include roof-mounted mechanical appurtenances; however, said appurtenances, and the screening required for them in § 650-34D(2)(b), shall be subject to site plan review and design standards. Rooftop mechanical equipment, including wireless communications equipment, shall be located and screened to minimize impacts on abutters and the general public. No interior space shall be occupied for any purpose above these height limits. This shall not preclude the use of a flat roof for purposes allowed in this section. (2) Roof decks, providing recreation and amenity areas for residents and businesses on the roof above the top story of a building, shall be encouraged in the Marlborough Village District. Roof decks may include open space areas for sitting and gardens; open air areas covered by permanent roofs (flat or sloped); indoor areas for social gathering, meetings, common kitchens, restrooms, and storage; spaces for mechanical equipment; and enclosures for elevators and stairs. The portions of a building designed as a roof deck shall be subject to maximum height restrictions, as but may be increased by special permit. XIV. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-41 (Table of Lot Area, Yards, and Height of Structures), District: Marlborough Village District MV, Height, and Notes #12 (as referenced therein) to read as follows: (new text shown as underlined, deleted text shown as strikethrough): District Height Marlborough Village District MV Minimum: 35 feet or 2.5 stories; Maximum: 64 stories: not to exceed a maximum of 6070 feet12 NOTES: 12 Within the Marlborough Village District, special permits may allow for an increase in height for a roof deck to 7 stories and up to 85 feet; also, provided that the height of any development within 50 feet of a residential district boundary, shall be stepped down and shall not exceed 52 feet except where allowed by special permit. [See § 650-34F(1).] XV. By amending Chapter 650 (Zoning), Section 650-37 (Special Provisions Applicable to the Wayside Zoning District), Subsection H(4)(A), entitled “Mixed Uses”, by inserting the following sentence at the end of the existing subsection: Floor usage in a mixed-use development shall conform to subsection (2) of the definition of “Mixed Use” set forth in Section 650-5(B). XVI. Effective Date. The effective date of these amendments shall be the date of passage. These amendments do not apply to any special permit or site plan approval, for which an application was submitted and/or a special permit or site plan approval was issued before the date of the first publication of notice of the public hearing pursuant to MGL c. 40A, s. 5 on these amendments. APPROVED. First Reading, suspended; Second Reading, adopted; Passage to Enroll, adopted; Passage to Ordain; adopted. No objection to passage in one evening. Councilor Landers opposed..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Go into executive session to discuss strategy with respect to…litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the…litigating...

Minutes, page 16

ProceduralPassed · 10–0

Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Marlborough City Council meet in executive session under Purpose 3 of the Open Meeting Law, MGL c. 30A, s. 21(a)(3), to “discuss strategy with respect to…litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the…litigating position of the public body” regarding the pending matter, JW Capital Partners, LLC and Marlborough TOTG LLC v. Marlborough City Council (Land Court No. 23 MISC 000199), as the chair hereby declares that discussion in an open session may have a detrimental effect on the City and the City Council’s litigating position. The City Council will not re-convene in open session after the Executive Session. APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 10 – Abstain: 1 Yea: Wagner, Doucette, Brown, Irish, Navin, Landers, Oram, Ossing, Perlman & Robey. Abstain: Dumais.

Yes: Brown, Doucette, Irish, Landers, Navin, Oram, Ossing, Perlman, Robey, WagnerAbstained: DumaisChristian Dumais abstained (shown as abstaining, not voting).

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Robey, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED: That the Marlborough City Council meet in executive session under Purpose 3 of the Open Meeting Law, MGL c. 30A, s. 21(a)(3), to “discuss strategy with respect to…litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the…litigating position of the public body” regarding the pending matter, JW Capital Partners, LLC and Marlborough TOTG LLC v. Marlborough City Council (Land Court No. 23 MISC 000199), as the chair hereby declares that discussion in an open session may have a detrimental effect on the City and the City Council’s litigating position. The City Council will not re-convene in open session after the Executive Session. APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 10 – Abstain: 1 Yea: Wagner, Doucette, Brown, Irish, Navin, Landers, Oram, Ossing, Perlman & Robey. Abstain: Dumais..” (Motion: Robey)

Read it in the official minutes, page 16 (PDF)

Adjourn

Minutes, page 16

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED There being no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council is herewith adjourned at 9:31 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Motion by Councilor Dumais, seconded by the Chair to adopt the following: ORDERED There being no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council is herewith adjourned at 9:31 PM; adopted..” (Motion: Dumais)

Read it in the official minutes, page 16 (PDF)

From the Marlborough City Council’s official minutes, posted by the City Clerk in the city’s Agenda Center (City Council). We check every vote against the councilors present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Councilor photos: Marlborough Patch candidate profiles (photos courtesy of the candidates; cropped by MassVoter). Trey Fuccillo: The Berkeley Beacon (Ashlyn Wang). The city website has no councilor photos. Heather Gould and former councilors show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.