← Marlborough City Council

Marlborough City Council · 2018–2019 Council · Regular meeting

April 8, 2019

52 recorded votes, 50 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · City meeting page

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Marlborough ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Peter J. Juaire, Mark A. Oram, Michael H. Ossing, Kathleen D. Robey, Joseph F. Delano, David Doucette, Christian Dumais, Robert J. Tunnera, John J. Irish, Edward J. Clancy, Donald R. Landers

Absent: None

During the meeting:

  • Joseph F. Delano recused from the vote on: Close the public hearing: On the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of St.
  • Joseph F. Delano recused from the vote on: Refer to the City Solicitor to Be Placed in Proper Legal Form for the April 29, 2019 City...: Application.
  • Peter J. Juaire recused from the vote on: Approve: Reappointment of Patricia Pope as Executive Director of the Council on Aging for a three-year.

Every vote, in order

Accept and file: Minutes of the City Council meeting, MARCH 25, 2019

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes of the City Council meeting, MARCH 25, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes of the City Council meeting, MARCH 25, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from Fabricio DaSilva, re: Request to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Application for Special Permit to construct a new...

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from Fabricio DaSilva, re: Request to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Application for Special Permit to construct a new 5 x 18 front porch on an existing structure, 3 Jonas Court, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from Fabricio DaSilva, re: Request to WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE, Application for Special Permit to construct a new 5 x 18 front porch on an existing structure, 3 Jonas Court, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Accept the withdrawal without prejudice: Application for Special Permit from Fabricio DaSilva, to construct a new 5 x 18 front porch on an...

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Application for Special Permit from Fabricio DaSilva, to construct a new 5 x 18 front porch on an existing structure, 3 Jonas Court, WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Application for Special Permit from Fabricio DaSilva, to construct a new 5 x 18 front porch on an existing structure, 3 Jonas Court, WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Close the public hearing: On the Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650, §5, §17, §18 & §48 relative to adding Food Trucks to the Table...

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650, §5, §17, §18 & §48 relative to adding Food Trucks to the Table of Uses, Order No. 19-1007543, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:05 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650, §5, §17, §18 & §48 relative to adding Food Trucks to the Table of Uses, Order No. 19-1007543, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:05 PM; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Close the public hearing: On the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of St. Mary’s Credit Union, re: Rezoning of land...

Minutes, page 1

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of St. Mary’s Credit Union, re: Rezoning of land located on John Street, Order No. 19-1007569, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:18 PM; adopted. Councilor Delano recused.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Delano recused.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment from Attorney Brian Falk on behalf of St. Mary’s Credit Union, re: Rezoning of land located on John Street, Order No. 19-1007569, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:18 PM; adopted. Councilor Delano recused..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Approve: Donation Acceptance in the amount of $3,000.00 for the Fire Department from Dwayne Thompson, Michael Burnell and Andrew Eick of Cummings...

Minutes, page 1

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Donation Acceptance in the amount of $3,000.00 for the Fire Department from Dwayne Thompson, Michael Burnell and Andrew Eick of Cummings Properties, LLC to be used for employee appreciation; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Donation Acceptance in the amount of $3,000.00 for the Fire Department from Dwayne Thompson, Michael Burnell and Andrew Eick of Cummings Properties, LLC to be used for employee appreciation; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Approve: Donation Acceptance in the amount of $20.00 for the Police Department from Marilyn Gaudette to be used for summer programs

Minutes, page 2

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Donation Acceptance in the amount of $20.00 for the Police Department from Marilyn Gaudette to be used for summer programs; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Donation Acceptance in the amount of $20.00 for the Police Department from Marilyn Gaudette to be used for summer programs; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Close the public hearing: On the Application for Special Permit from Attorney Brian Falk, on behalf of E on Main, to construct a Mixed-Use...

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Application for Special Permit from Attorney Brian Falk, on behalf of E on Main, to construct a Mixed-Use Development in the Marlborough Village District consisting of both residential and commercial space at 161-175 Main Street, Order No. 19-1007571, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:51 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the PUBLIC HEARING On the Application for Special Permit from Attorney Brian Falk, on behalf of E on Main, to construct a Mixed-Use Development in the Marlborough Village District consisting of both residential and commercial space at 161-175 Main Street, Order No. 19-1007571, all were heard who wish to be heard, hearing closed at 8:51 PM; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from Councilor Ossing, re: Municipal Aggregation – Six-month fixed price contract with DYNEGY, May, 2019 through...

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from Councilor Ossing, re: Municipal Aggregation – Six-month fixed price contract with DYNEGY, May, 2019 through October, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from Councilor Ossing, re: Municipal Aggregation – Six-month fixed price contract with DYNEGY, May, 2019 through October, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Refer to the Finance Committee: Transfer Request in the amount of $699,088.00 which moves funds from Economic Development to MEDC Funding to fund...

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $699,088.00 which moves funds from Economic Development to MEDC Funding to fund the FY20 operations, refer to FINANCE COMMITTEE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Transfer Request in the amount of $699,088.00 which moves funds from Economic Development to MEDC Funding to fund the FY20 operations, refer to FINANCE COMMITTEE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Approve: Reimbursement Acceptance for the Fire Department in the amount of $7,409.02 from FEMA for storm expenditures from the snow event of March...

Minutes, page 2

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Reimbursement Acceptance for the Fire Department in the amount of $7,409.02 from FEMA for storm expenditures from the snow event of March 13, 2018; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: Under authority of MGL Chapter 44, Section 53A, the City Council hereby APPROVES the Reimbursement Acceptance for the Fire Department in the amount of $7,409.02 from FEMA for storm expenditures from the snow event of March 13, 2018; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Approve: City Council, upon reconsideration, hereby removes the conditions currently set forth in Order No. 18-1007441A for acceptance of a grant...

Minutes, page 3

Adopt orderPassed · 6–5

ORDERED: That the City Council, upon reconsideration, hereby removes the conditions currently set forth in Order No. 18-1007441A for acceptance of a grant in the amount of $6,219.00 awarded to the DPW to fund 50% of the cost to purchase two Level 2 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations and imposes the following new conditions in place thereof, APPROVED; adopted. 1) The two (2) charging stations will be set up for City vehicle use only. 2) The charging stations will be installed on the first floor of the parking garage or a location that the DPW Commissioner sees fit. President Clancy declared a hand count of six Councilors in favor (Doucette, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Oram & Ossing) and five Councilors opposed (Delano, Dumais, Tunnera, Juaire & Robey).

Yes: Clancy, Doucette, Irish, Landers, Oram, OssingNo: Delano, Dumais, Juaire, Robey, TunneraA hand count; the minutes name the councilors on each side (“declared a hand count of six Councilors in favor (Doucette, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Oram & Ossing) and five Councilors opposed (Delano, Dumais, Tunnera, Juaire & Robey)”).

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the City Council, upon reconsideration, hereby removes the conditions currently set forth in Order No. 18-1007441A for acceptance of a grant in the amount of $6,219.00 awarded to the DPW to fund 50% of the cost to purchase two Level 2 Electric Vehicle Charging Stations and imposes the following new conditions in place thereof, APPROVED; adopted. 1) The two (2) charging stations will be set up for City vehicle use only. 2) The charging stations will be installed on the first floor of the parking garage or a location that the DPW Commissioner sees fit. President Clancy declared a hand count of six Councilors in favor (Doucette, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Oram & Ossing) and five Councilors opposed (Delano, Dumais, Tunnera, Juaire & Robey)..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Moved to item 32: Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling and construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same foundation footprint at 180 Cullinane Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 19-1007512B, MOVED TO ITEM 32; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling and construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same foundation footprint at 180 Cullinane Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 19-1007512B, MOVED TO ITEM 32; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Approve: Proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 5...

Minutes, page 3

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 5 the words “and any approved ancillary residential community are” and inserting in place thereof the word “is”, so the section would now read “The lot or lots on which an RCO-D/T community is located shall contain, on a consolidated basis, at least 7,000 square feet per housing unit.”, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 5 the words “and any approved ancillary residential community are” and inserting in place thereof the word “is”, so the section would now read “The lot or lots on which an RCO-D/T community is located shall contain, on a consolidated basis, at least 7,000 square feet per housing unit.”, APPROVED; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Approve: Proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 9...

Minutes, page 3

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 9 the words “and in any permitted ancillary residential community”, so the section would now read “Maximum combined lot coverage in an RCO-D/T community shall not exceed 40% of the total lot size.”, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the proposed amendment to Chapter 650 as outlined in Order No. 18/19- 1007452D is hereby further amended by striking out in 650-22 C (i) 9 the words “and in any permitted ancillary residential community”, so the section would now read “Maximum combined lot coverage in an RCO-D/T community shall not exceed 40% of the total lot size.”, APPROVED; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Moved to item 31: Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to Multifamily Retirement Community, 90 Crowley Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 18/19- 1007452D (X18-1007198G), MOVED TO ITEM 31; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to Multifamily Retirement Community, 90 Crowley Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 18/19- 1007452D (X18-1007198G), MOVED TO ITEM 31; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 which will...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 which will create the Executive Residential Overlay District in the Simarano Drive and Cedar Hill Road area, Order No. 19-1007533A, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Amendment to Chapter 650 which will create the Executive Residential Overlay District in the Simarano Drive and Cedar Hill Road area, Order No. 19-1007533A, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment, land off Valley Street...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment, land off Valley Street, Order No. 19-1007552A, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Favorable Recommendation on the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment, land off Valley Street, Order No. 19-1007552A, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from the Planning Board, re: Decision for Colbea Enterprises, LLC, Request for Sign Variance, 342 Boston Post Road East

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Decision for Colbea Enterprises, LLC, Request for Sign Variance, 342 Boston Post Road East, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from the Planning Board, re: Decision for Colbea Enterprises, LLC, Request for Sign Variance, 342 Boston Post Road East, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Refer to the Public Services Committee: Application for Renewal of Junk Dealer/Second Hand Dealer License, TVI, Inc., d/b/a Savers, 222A East Main...

Minutes, page 3

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Application for Renewal of Junk Dealer/Second Hand Dealer License, TVI, Inc., d/b/a Savers, 222A East Main Street, refer to PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Application for Renewal of Junk Dealer/Second Hand Dealer License, TVI, Inc., d/b/a Savers, 222A East Main Street, refer to PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 3 (PDF)

Refer to the Public Services Committee: Set MONDAY APRIL 29, 2019 as DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING Petition from MA Electric to install a new pole 47-84...

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That there being no objection thereto set MONDAY APRIL 29, 2019 as DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING Petition from MA Electric to install a new pole 47-84 to use as a stub pole for poles 47 and 47-5 on Bolton Street, refer to PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That there being no objection thereto set MONDAY APRIL 29, 2019 as DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING Petition from MA Electric to install a new pole 47-84 to use as a stub pole for poles 47 and 47-5 on Bolton Street, refer to PUBLIC SERVICES COMMITTEE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, School Committee, March 12, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, School Committee, March 12, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, School Committee, March 12, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Board of Assessors, March 20, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Board of Assessors, March 20, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Board of Assessors, March 20, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Conservation Commission, March 7, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Conservation Commission, March 7, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Conservation Commission, March 7, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Council on Aging, February 11, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Council on Aging, February 11, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Council on Aging, February 11, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Historical Commission, March 7, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Historical Commission, March 7, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Historical Commission, March 7, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, License Board, February 11, 2019, February 27, 2019 & March 21, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, License Board, February 11, 2019, February 27, 2019 & March 21, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, License Board, February 11, 2019, February 27, 2019 & March 21, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Planning Board, March 11, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Planning Board, March 11, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Planning Board, March 11, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Retirement Board, February 26, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Retirement Board, February 26, 2019, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Retirement Board, February 26, 2019, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Accept and file: Minutes, Traffic Commission, February 27, 2019

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Minutes, Traffic Commission, February 27, 2019, FILE;

The minutes print this order without the usual “adopted” and with no count or names; MassVoter shows the action the order records (result only) and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Minutes, Traffic Commission, February 27, 2019, FILE;.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Refer to the Legal Department: Following CLAIMS

Minutes, page 4

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the following CLAIMS, refer to the LEGAL DEPARTMENT; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the following CLAIMS, refer to the LEGAL DEPARTMENT; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 9

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Approve: Pursuant to Order No. 18-1007236 the City Council Finance Committee reviewed the abbreviated budget process utilized for FY19 and...

Minutes, page 9

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That pursuant to Order No. 18-1007236 the City Council Finance Committee reviewed the abbreviated budget process utilized for FY19 and concluded that it worked effectively and further recommends to the full City Council that the practice be continued for FY20, APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That pursuant to Order No. 18-1007236 the City Council Finance Committee reviewed the abbreviated budget process utilized for FY19 and concluded that it worked effectively and further recommends to the full City Council that the practice be continued for FY20, APPROVED; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 9

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Approve: City Council hereby approves the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Financial Review Recommendation for adopting an abbreviated budget...

Minutes, page 9

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the City Council hereby approves the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Financial Review Recommendation for adopting an abbreviated budget authorization format for all departments for the FY20 budget. It is further moved that the City Council will assess the results in April, 2020 to determine if the practice will continue. APPROVED; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the City Council hereby approves the Massachusetts Department of Revenue Financial Review Recommendation for adopting an abbreviated budget authorization format for all departments for the FY20 budget. It is further moved that the City Council will assess the results in April, 2020 to determine if the practice will continue. APPROVED; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 9

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Ordinance amending Chapter 473 “Poles”

Minutes, page 9

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH THAT THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED BY AMENDING CHAPTER 473, ENTITLED “POLES, WIRES AND CONDUITS,” AS FOLLOWS: I. By adding to Chapter 473 a new Article III, entitled “Small Cell Wireless Facilities within Public Rights of Way,” as follows: Sec. 473-27. Purpose. A. The purpose and intent of this Article III is to provide a uniform and comprehensive set of regulations and standards for the permitting, development, siting, installation, design, operation and maintenance of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities in the City of Marlborough. These regulations are intended to prescribe clear and reasonable criteria to assess and process applications in a consistent and expeditious manner, while reducing the impacts associated with small cell wireless facilities. This Article III provides standards necessary to: (1) preserve and promote harmonious land uses and the public rights of way in the City; (2) promote and protect public health and safety, community welfare, visual resources, and the aesthetic quality of the City; (3) provide for the orderly, managed, and efficient development of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities in accordance with federal and state laws, rules, and regulations; and (4) encourage new and more efficient technology in the provision of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities. B. This chapter is not intended...

The minutes record the result only (“adopted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH THAT THE CITY CODE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED BY AMENDING CHAPTER 473, ENTITLED “POLES, WIRES AND CONDUITS,” AS FOLLOWS: I. By adding to Chapter 473 a new Article III, entitled “Small Cell Wireless Facilities within Public Rights of Way,” as follows: Sec. 473-27. Purpose. A. The purpose and intent of this Article III is to provide a uniform and comprehensive set of regulations and standards for the permitting, development, siting, installation, design, operation and maintenance of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities in the City of Marlborough. These regulations are intended to prescribe clear and reasonable criteria to assess and process applications in a consistent and expeditious manner, while reducing the impacts associated with small cell wireless facilities. This Article III provides standards necessary to: (1) preserve and promote harmonious land uses and the public rights of way in the City; (2) promote and protect public health and safety, community welfare, visual resources, and the aesthetic quality of the City; (3) provide for the orderly, managed, and efficient development of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities in accordance with federal and state laws, rules, and regulations; and (4) encourage new and more efficient technology in the provision of small cell wireless telecommunications facilities. B. This chapter is not intended, nor shall it be interpreted or applied, to: (1) prohibit or effectively prohibit any personal wireless service provider's ability to provide personal wireless services; (2) prohibit or effectively prohibit any entity's ability to provide any interstate or intrastate telecommunications service, subject to any competitively neutral and nondiscriminatory rules or regulation for rights-of-way management; (3) unreasonably discriminate among providers of functionally equivalent services; (4) deny any request for authorization to place, construct or modify personal wireless service facilities on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such wireless facilities comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions; or (5) otherwise authorize the City to preempt any applicable federal or state law. Sec. 473-28. Application Process. Applications for permits to install small cell wireless facilities shall be processed as follows. A. Fees. Applications shall be submitted to the City Council by filing with the City Clerk’s Office in accordance with subsection D below, accompanied by the application filing fee of $500.00 per application, payable to the City of Marlborough. The $500.00 fee will cover up to five (5) locations. Each application for more than 5 installations is subject to a separate fee of $100.00 per installation. B. Public Hearing Notices. The applicant must also pay for legal notices of the public hearing to be mailed to abutters directly abutting, and across the street from, the property where the pole for the proposed small cell wireless facility currently is, or is proposed to be, located. The applicant is responsible for obtaining the abutters list for each pole location contained within the application. C. Pre-Submittal Verification by DPW Engineering. No application will be filed as provided in subsection D below unless and until the Engineering Division of the City’s Department of Public Works (“DPW Engineering”) shall have first verified that the applicant has assembled, to DPW Engineering’s satisfaction, all of the application contents listed in subsection E below. D. Payment of Application Filing Fees and Number of Application Copies. The applicant shall pay all application filing fees to the City Clerk’s Office and shall file the following number of sets of application materials at the offices set forth below: Number of Sets Office 3 City Clerk’s Office 1 City Engineer 1 Building Commissioner 12 City Council Office E. Contents of Application. Applications shall include the following information: (1) Applicant’s name, address, telephone number and email address. (2) Names, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses of anyone acting on behalf of the applicant with respect to the application. (3) Detailed drawings and descriptions of the equipment to be mounted on the pole(s) in question, including: a. Type of equipment; b. Specifications of equipment (including but not limited to dimensions and weight); c. Equipment mount type and material; d. Power source or sources for equipment, including necessary wires, cables, and conduit; e. Expected life of equipment; f. Coverage area of equipment, including: i. Amount of antennas ii. Antenna model iii. Antenna length iv. Antenna height v. Typical coverage area radius; g. Hardening, including: i. If there is a battery backup ii. If there is a generator backup; and h. Renderings/photo simulations and elevation of equipment. (4) Detailed map with locations of the poles on which equipment is to be located, including specific pole identification number, if applicable, and the geographic areas the equipment will service. (5) Detailed map showing existing and proposed small cell installations within 500 feet of the application site. (6) Certification by a registered professional engineer that the pole will safely support the proposed equipment. (7) Written consent by the pole owner to the proposed installation. (8) Affidavit from a radio frequency engineer outlining the network/network service requirements in Marlborough and how each installation addresses that need in Marlborough. Such affidavit should characterize, through or with coverage maps, the current level of coverage and how the desired installation(s) will change the current level of coverage, including current and proposed coverage, and the breakdown of “excellent,” “good,” and “poor” reception areas. (9) Liability insurance certificate, naming the City of Marlborough as an additional insured. (10) Description as to why the desired location is superior to other similar locations, from a community perspective, including but not limited to: a. Visual aspects; and b. Proximity to single-family residences. (11) Description of efforts to locate the equipment on existing poles which currently exist or are under construction. A good faith effort to locate on such poles is required and evidence of such efforts must be included within the application. (12) An affidavit from the applicant which certifies that it will maintain the installations in good repair and according to FCC standards, and will remove any installation not in such good repair, or not in use, within sixty (60) days of being no longer in good repair or no longer in use. F. Placement of Application on Agenda. Once the application has been submitted and all filing fees have been paid, the City Clerk’s Office will place the application on the City Council agenda for the scheduling of a public hearing. G. Shot Clocks. The City Council shall have sixty (60) days from the application’s filing date for processing an application for collocation of a small cell wireless facility using a pre-existing pole, and ninety (90) days for processing an application for attachment of small cell wireless facility proposing a new pole. These shot clocks may be extended by mutual written agreement of the City Council and the applicant, such agreement to be timely filed with the City Clerk’s Office and a copy of that filing to be submitted for informational purposes on the agenda for the next regular Council meeting; provided, however, that by vote of the standing Council committee to which any given application has been referred by the full Council, that committee may, by simple majority vote at a duly noticed public meeting, authorize the following committee members to sign the written extension agreement on behalf of the full Council: a) the chairman of the committee; or, b) in his or her absence or incapacity, its vice-chairman; or, c) when a quorum of the committee is otherwise not present, the Council President or Vice-President sitting for that meeting as an ex officio member of that committee. H. Council Decision. The City Council may grant, grant with conditions, or deny the application based on inadequate capacity of the pole or mounting structure, safety concerns, reliability concerns, failure to meet applicable engineering standards, and/or failure to meet applicable aesthetic requirements as hereinbelow set forth. Sec. 473-29. Annual Re-Certification and Affidavit. A. Annual Re-Certification and Affidavit. Each year on July 1, the small cell wireless equipment owner shall submit an affidavit which shall list, by location, all small cell wireless installations it owns within the City of Marlborough, and shall certify: (1) each such installation that remains in use; (2) that such in-use installations remain covered by liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured; and (3) each such installation which is no longer in use. B. Annual Re-Certification Fee. The equipment owner shall pay to the City of Marlborough an annual re-certification fee of $250.00 per installation which remains in use. C. Facility No Longer in Use. Any small cell wireless facility which is no longer in use shall be removed by the owner, at the owner’s expense, within sixty (60) days of the City Council’s receipt of the annual re-certification affidavit. D. Non-Removal of Facility No Longer in Use. Any small cell wireless installation which is not removed by the owner, at the owner’s expense, within sixty (60) days after being listed in the annual re-certification affidavit as no longer in use shall be subject to a fine of $100/day until such installation is removed by the owner. E. Failure to Timely Submit Re-Certification/Remove Facility No Longer in Use. Where such annual re-certification has not been timely submitted, or equipment no longer in use has not been removed within the 60-day period, no further applications for small cell wireless installations will be accepted by the City Clerk’s Office until such time as the annual re-certification has been submitted and all fees and fines have been paid. Sec. 473-30. Aesthetics and Additional City Requirements. A. Poles. (1) No small cell wireless equipment shall be installed on double poles. (2) Within the public right of way, only pole-mounted antennas shall be permitted and all telecommunications towers within the meaning of City Code sec. 650-25.A are prohibited. (3) Absent City Council permission, no new poles are permitted within the public right of way that are not replacing an existing pole. If an applicant proposes to replace a pole in order to accommodate the small cell wireless facility, the pole shall match the appearance of the original pole to the extent feasible, including size, height, color, materials and style, unless another design better accomplishes the objectives of this section as determined by the Council. Such replacement pole shall not exceed the height of the pole it is replacing by more than seven (7) feet. (4) If a new pole is permitted by the City Council to be placed within the public right of way, the new pole shall be designed to resemble existing poles in the right of way, including size, height, color, materials and style, unless another design better accomplishes the objectives of this section as determined by the Council. Such new poles that are not replacement poles shall be located no closer than ninety (90) feet to an existing pole. (5) Small cell wireless installation equipment (meters, boxes, etc.) shall be mounted on the pole a minimum of eleven (11) feet above ground level. (6) No small cell wireless installation equipment shall be replaced or altered on a pole without a re-application, hearing and approval from the City Council, unless the equipment is no longer functioning and it is being replaced with the same or substantially similar equipment. (7) The maximum height of any antenna mounted to an existing pole shall not exceed 24 inches above the height of the then-existing pole; provided that in any event: a. no small cell wireless facility shall be located on a pole that is less than twenty-six (26) feet in height; and b. no facility shall exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height, including but not limited to the pole and any antenna that protrudes above the pole. (8) Pole-mounted equipment shall not exceed six (6) cubic feet in dimension. (9) Not more than one (1) small cell wireless facility shall be mounted per pole. B. Location. (1) Each component part of a facility shall be located so as not to cause any physical or visual obstruction to pedestrian or vehicular traffic, inconvenience to the public's use of the right of way, or safety hazards to pedestrians and motorists. (2) A facility shall not be located within any portion of the public right of way interfering with access to fire hydrants, fire stations, fire escapes, water valves, underground vaults, valve housing structures, or any other vital public health and safety facility. (3) Each pole-mounted small cell wireless telecommunications facility must be separated by at least 1,500 feet. (4) All new wires needed to service the wireless telecommunications facility must be installed within the width of the existing pole so as to not exceed the diameter and height of the existing pole. C. Americans with Disabilities Act Compliance. All facilities shall be built and maintained in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)/Architectural Access Board (AAB). D. Residential Neighborhoods. If an applicant seeks to place a small cell wireless facility in a residentially-zoned neighborhood, the applicant: a. Should seek to avoid attaching to poles that are within twenty- five (25) feet of an existing driveway so that the property owner can plant trees that could shield the wireless equipment from view; and b. Should seek to avoid poles where the installation and/or ongoing maintenance will require significant tree trimming due to the wireless equipment. E. Satisfactory Material, Construction and Work. The small cell wireless facility shall be of such material and construction, and all installation and maintenance work shall be done in such manner, as to be satisfactory to the City Council and DPW Engineering. If the DPW Engineering shall determine that such material, construction and/or work is (a) placing or tending to place at risk the public health, safety, and welfare, (b) interfering or tending to interfere with pedestrian and/or vehicular traffic, and/or (c) causing or tending to cause damage to the public right of way or any property adjacent to the location of the pole in question, the DPW Engineering shall forthwith notify the City Council, which shall review that determination for possible further action as to the applicant. F. Indemnification. The applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City against all damages, injuries, costs, expenses, and any and all claims, demands and liabilities whatsoever of every name and nature, both in law and equity, allegedly caused by the acts or neglect of the applicant, its employees, agents and servants, in any manner arising out of the rights and privileges granted herein to the applicant for its small cell wireless facility. Such indemnification shall not be limited by the amount of the applicant’s liability insurance naming the City as an additional insured. G. City Streets and/or Sidewalks. All cutting of and/or digging into City streets and/or sidewalks by or on behalf of an applicant in conjunction with its small cell wireless facility is prohibited, as is all underground installation associated with the small cell wireless facility; provided, however, that the grounding rod proposed to be installed as part of the small cell wireless facility is permitted as long as: 1) The applicant installs the rod immediately adjacent to the pole so as to cause minimal disturbance to the surface of the street or sidewalk; and 2) The applicant restores the street or sidewalk surface to its pre- disturbance condition to the satisfaction of the DPW Engineering. H. Repair of Damage. The applicant shall repair, at its sole cost and expense, any damage including, but not limited to subsidence, cracking, erosion, collapse, weakening, or loss of lateral support to City streets, sidewalks, walks, curbs, gutters, trees, parkways, street lights, traffic signals, improvements of any kind or nature, or utility lines and systems, underground utility line and systems, or sewer systems and sewer lines that result from any activities performed in connection with the installation or maintenance of a wireless telecommunications facility in the public right of way. The applicant shall restore such areas, structures and systems to the condition in which they existed prior to the installation or maintenance that necessitated the repairs. In the event the applicant fails to complete such repair within the number of days stated on a written notice from the City Engineering Division, the Division shall cause such repair to be completed at the applicant's sole cost and expense. I. Visual Impact Minimization. The small cell wireless facility shall be color- coordinated so as to best minimize the visual impact of the facility. J. Side of Pole on which to Mount Equipment. The small cell wireless facility’s equipment cabinet, circuit breaker box, and electric meter main shall be mounted on the side of the pole facing away from the roadway. K. Future Road Reconstruction/Repair. Any future road reconstruction or repair project by the City and/or the Commonwealth requiring the relocation of the pole shall result in the applicant’s moving its small cell wireless facility to another pole in a timely fashion after having been notified by the DPW Engineering about the road project; provided, however, that any such relocation shall require further City Council approval. L. Construction and/or Installation Schedule. Prior to the commencement of construction and/or installation of the small cell wireless facility, the applicant shall provide the DPW Engineering with a written construction and/or installation schedule satisfactory to DPW Engineering. M. Removal Bond. Prior to the commencement of construction and/or installation of its small cell wireless facility, an applicant shall provide the City’s Chief Procurement Officer (the “City CPO”) with a bond from a surety authorized to do business in Massachusetts and satisfactory to the City CPO in an amount equal to the cost of removal of the small cell wireless facility from the pole in question and for the repair and/or restoration of the public way, in the vicinity of the pole in question, to the condition the public way was in as of the date when the relevant application was submitted to the City Clerk’s Office, said amount to be determined by DPW Engineering. The amount of the bond shall be the total of the estimate by DPW Engineering plus an annual increase of 3% for the operating life of the small cell wireless facility. The applicant shall notify the City CPO and DPW Engineering of any cancellation of, or change in the terms or conditions in, the bond. N. Each Requirement a Permit Condition. Each and every requirement set forth in sections 29 and 30 of this Chapter 473 shall be deemed to be continuing conditions on the applicant’s pole location permit granted by the City Council. O. Failure to Comply with Conditions. An applicant’s failure to comply with any of the City Council’s conditions to the Council’s satisfaction or, as applicable, DPW Engineering or the City CPO, shall result in the City Council’s review of the applicant’s pole location permit(s). II. This amendment shall become effective immediately upon passage. APPROVED; adopted. First Reading, suspended; Second Reading, adopted; Passage to Enroll, adopted; Passage to Ordain; adopted. No objection to passage in one evening..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 9 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 17

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 17 (PDF)

Refer to the City Solicitor to Be Placed in Proper Legal Form for the April 29, 2019 City...: Open Space Covenant and Restriction for certain land...

Minutes, page 17

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Open Space Covenant and Restriction for certain land on a plan entitled “Open Space Exhibit for Apex Center, 240 Boston Post Road West, Marlborough, MA, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Open Space Covenant and Restriction for certain land on a plan entitled “Open Space Exhibit for Apex Center, 240 Boston Post Road West, Marlborough, MA, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 17 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 17

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 17 (PDF)

Refer to the City Solicitor to Be Placed in Proper Legal Form for the April 29, 2019 City...: Application for Special Permit from Attorney Sem...

Minutes, page 17

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Application for Special Permit from Attorney Sem Aykanian to modify existing Special Permit issued to Main Street Bank, 81 Granger Boulevard on June 22, 2009, Order No. 09-1002152C, to modify permit to allow for an electronic digital display (electronic message board) sign, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted. Councilor Delano recused.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Delano recused.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Application for Special Permit from Attorney Sem Aykanian to modify existing Special Permit issued to Main Street Bank, 81 Granger Boulevard on June 22, 2009, Order No. 09-1002152C, to modify permit to allow for an electronic digital display (electronic message board) sign, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted. Councilor Delano recused..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 17 (PDF)

Suspend the rules

Minutes, page 18

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

Suspension of the Rules requested – granted

The minutes record the result only (“granted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“Suspension of the Rules requested – granted.”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Refer to the City Solicitor to Be Placed in Proper Legal Form for the April 29, 2019 City...: Application for LED Sign Special Permit, Main Street...

Minutes, page 18

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Application for LED Sign Special Permit, Main Street Bank, 81 Granger Boulevard, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted. Councilor Delano recused.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Delano recused.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Application for LED Sign Special Permit, Main Street Bank, 81 Granger Boulevard, refer to the CITY SOLICITOR TO BE PLACED IN PROPER LEGAL FORM FOR THE APRIL 29, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEETING; adopted. Councilor Delano recused..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Approve: Reappointment of Patricia Pope as Executive Director of the Council on Aging for a three-year term to expire from date of City Council...

Minutes, page 18

Confirm appointmentPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Reappointment of Patricia Pope as Executive Director of the Council on Aging for a three-year term to expire from date of City Council approval, APPROVED; adopted. Councilor Juaire recused.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Juaire recused.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Reappointment of Patricia Pope as Executive Director of the Council on Aging for a three-year term to expire from date of City Council approval, APPROVED; adopted. Councilor Juaire recused..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Approve: Order relative to Municipal Aggregation that was

Minutes, page 18

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Order relative to Municipal Aggregation that was approved by the City Council on April 10, 2017 (Order No. 17-1006881) is hereby replaced and the following adopted in place thereof: 1. This order supersedes Order No. 17-1006881 dated April 10, 2017. 2. The goal of the Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee is to obtain competitive electric supply offers that will provide stability and predictability and on a yearly average be lower than the National Grid Fixed Basic Service Rates during the same period. 3. Establish an Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee that will review competitive electric supply agreements and make recommendations to the Mayor. The Municipal Aggregation Committee will consist of 5 members including: ▪ The Mayor ▪ Two City Councilors (appointed by the City Council President) ▪ The Chief Procurement Officer ▪ The DPW Commissioner (or designee) ▪ A quorum shall consist of a minimum of 3 members 4. The Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee will provide periodic updates to the City Council on Municipal Aggregation implementation. 5. All suppliers of electricity licensed by the Department of Public Utilities and qualified to do business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts can participate in the City’s Municipal Aggregation Program. APPROVED; adopted. Councilor Doucette opposed.

The minutes record the result only (“APPROVED”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Doucette opposed.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Order relative to Municipal Aggregation that was approved by the City Council on April 10, 2017 (Order No. 17-1006881) is hereby replaced and the following adopted in place thereof: 1. This order supersedes Order No. 17-1006881 dated April 10, 2017. 2. The goal of the Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee is to obtain competitive electric supply offers that will provide stability and predictability and on a yearly average be lower than the National Grid Fixed Basic Service Rates during the same period. 3. Establish an Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee that will review competitive electric supply agreements and make recommendations to the Mayor. The Municipal Aggregation Committee will consist of 5 members including: ▪ The Mayor ▪ Two City Councilors (appointed by the City Council President) ▪ The Chief Procurement Officer ▪ The DPW Commissioner (or designee) ▪ A quorum shall consist of a minimum of 3 members 4. The Ad-Hoc Municipal Aggregation Committee will provide periodic updates to the City Council on Municipal Aggregation implementation. 5. All suppliers of electricity licensed by the Department of Public Utilities and qualified to do business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts can participate in the City’s Municipal Aggregation Program. APPROVED; adopted. Councilor Doucette opposed..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to...

Minutes, page 18

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to Multifamily Retirement Community, 90 Crowley Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 18/19- 1007452D (X18-1007198G), FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Proposed Zoning Ordinance Amendment, Chapter 650 §22 & §5, relative to Multifamily Retirement Community, 90 Crowley Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 18/19- 1007452D (X18-1007198G), FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 18 (PDF)

Zoning ordinance amendment (MGL Chapter 40A §5): zoning ordinance of the city of marlborough, as amended,

Minutes, page 19

Adopt orderPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: THAT, PURSUANT TO § 5 OF CHAPTER 40A OF THE GENERAL LAWS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, HAVING RECEIVED FOR ITS CONSIDERATION CHANGES IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, TO FURTHER AMEND CHAPTER 650, NOW ORDAINS THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED BY AMENDING AND ADDING THERETO AS FOLLOWS: I. Section 650-5, entitled “Definitions; word usage,” is hereby amended by striking out in its entirety the definition of “retirement community” and inserting in place thereof the following new definitions: RETIREMENT COMMUNITY - DETACHED AND TOWNHOMES – A community consisting of detached or attached (only alongside walls in so-called “townhouse” style) structures, constructed expressly for use as housing for persons aged 55 or over, on one parcel or on contiguous parcels of land, subject to the provisions of MGL c. 151B, § 4, as amended. RETIREMENT COMMUNITY - MULTIFAMILY – A community consisting of a single multiple unit structure constructed expressly for use as housing for persons aged 55 or over, on one parcel or on contiguous parcels of land, subject to the provisions of MGL c. 151B, § 4, as amended. II. Section 650-22, entitled “Retirement Community Overlay Districts,” is hereby amended as follows: a. By striking out in its entirety subsection A thereof, entitled “Purpose,” and inserting in place thereof a new subsection A, entitled “Purpose,” as follows: Purpose. The purpose of...

The minutes record the result only (“adopted”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted. The minutes also say: “Councilor Irish opposed.”

From the minutes

“ORDERED: THAT, PURSUANT TO § 5 OF CHAPTER 40A OF THE GENERAL LAWS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, HAVING RECEIVED FOR ITS CONSIDERATION CHANGES IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, TO FURTHER AMEND CHAPTER 650, NOW ORDAINS THAT THE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MARLBOROUGH, AS AMENDED, BE FURTHER AMENDED BY AMENDING AND ADDING THERETO AS FOLLOWS: I. Section 650-5, entitled “Definitions; word usage,” is hereby amended by striking out in its entirety the definition of “retirement community” and inserting in place thereof the following new definitions: RETIREMENT COMMUNITY - DETACHED AND TOWNHOMES – A community consisting of detached or attached (only alongside walls in so-called “townhouse” style) structures, constructed expressly for use as housing for persons aged 55 or over, on one parcel or on contiguous parcels of land, subject to the provisions of MGL c. 151B, § 4, as amended. RETIREMENT COMMUNITY - MULTIFAMILY – A community consisting of a single multiple unit structure constructed expressly for use as housing for persons aged 55 or over, on one parcel or on contiguous parcels of land, subject to the provisions of MGL c. 151B, § 4, as amended. II. Section 650-22, entitled “Retirement Community Overlay Districts,” is hereby amended as follows: a. By striking out in its entirety subsection A thereof, entitled “Purpose,” and inserting in place thereof a new subsection A, entitled “Purpose,” as follows: Purpose. The purpose of the Retirement Community Overlay District shall be to advance the public health, safety and welfare by providing for the development of retirement communities that provide housing choices for persons aged 55 or over on sites which are otherwise zoned for other purposes but which, because of the size of the parcel being developed and its proximity to other residential neighborhoods and/or residential amenities and supportive services, will provide an appropriate environment for a retirement community b. By amending subsection C thereof, entitled “Permitted uses,” as follows: i. by striking out in the introduction thereto the words “retirement community” and inserting in place thereof the following words: Retirement Community - Detached and Townhomes, or a Retirement Community – Multifamily ii. by striking out the numbered provisions in subsection C which follow the introduction thereto and inserting in place thereof a new sub-subsection (i), entitled “Retirement Community - Detached and Townhomes (RCO-D/T),” as follows: (i) Retirement Community - Detached and Townhomes (RCO-D/T). (1) No building in an RCO-D/T community shall be more than 2 1/2 stories in height. (2) Each building in an RCO-D/T community shall face either upon an existing street or upon a public or private way constructed within said RCO-D/T community and shall have a minimum front yard of no less than 20 feet from the edge of the paved way to the closest point of the structure and a side yard of not less than 10 feet from the edge of the paved way to the closest point of the structure. Each building, whether principal or accessory, shall be at least 10 feet distant from any other building by airline distance between the nearest points of the buildings. (3) No dwelling in an RCO-D/T community shall contain less than 1,000 square feet of living area or more than 2,400 square feet of living area. (4) All dwelling units in an RCO-D/T community shall be detached from the others or attached only alongside walls in the so-called "townhouse" style. (5) The lot or lots on which an RCO-D/T community is located shall contain, on a consolidated basis, at least 7,000 square feet per housing unit. (6) No part of any principal building in an RCO-D/T community shall be less than 25 feet from any exterior lot line or less than 50 feet from the side of any public way. (7) Each dwelling unit in an RCO-D/T community shall have its own attached yard area. (8) Required off-street parking for each dwelling unit in an RCO-D/T community shall be adjacent thereto. Each unit shall be required to provide at least one parking space inside a garage and an additional space in front of a garage, said garage to be attached to said unit. The City Council may, as a condition of its special permit, require additional off-street parking areas to be used in common by dwelling unit owners and their invitees. In addition, the City Council may, as a condition of the special permit, require the adoption of legally enforceable condominium bylaws or other similar regulations to limit or prohibit the presence in an RCO-D/T community, either entirely or except in designated locations, of boats, boat trailers, campers, or other recreational vehicles. (9) Maximum combined lot coverage in an RCO-D/T community shall not exceed 40% of the total lot size. (10) Each lot or contiguous lots upon which an RCO- D/T community is located shall have total frontage on an existing public way of at least 250 feet. Each lot or combination of lots shall have a total size of not less than 10 acres. The underlying zoning district for all said land shall be either Industrial or Limited Industrial. (11) The City Council may, as a permit condition, require that all proposed condominium bylaws or similar binding RCO-D/T community regulations which may be relevant to the issuance of the permit, including but not limited to bylaw provisions prohibiting the presence of children residing in an RCO-D/T community and limiting or prohibiting the presence in a RCO-D/T community of boats, boat trailers, or recreational vehicles, be made a part of the special permit and that any change to or failure to enforce said provisions shall be a violation of said special permit. (12) The City Council may, as a permit condition, require that a proposed RCO-D/T community be constructed entirely on one lot, and that, from and after the date of the issuance of the building permit for said community or any portion thereof, no subdivision of said lot shall be allowed without the express approval of the City Council; provided, however, that the recording of a condominium master deed and the conveyance of condominium units within the area covered by said deed shall be allowed. (13) No unit in an RCO-D/T community shall have more than three bedrooms. (14) If an RCO/DT community is proposed which contains at least 30 acres of land, the following provisions shall supersede those found elsewhere in § 650-22: (a) The lot or lots on which an RCO/DT community is located shall contain at least 5,000 square feet per unit in the RCO/DT community; (b) Maximum lot coverage in the RCO/DT community shall not exceed 50% of the total lot size, excluding from the lot size any land which, prior to development of the site as a RCO/DT community, would be defined as a "resource area," as that term is defined in M.G.L. c. 131, §40. (c) Each lot or contiguous set of lots upon which a RCO/DT community is located shall have total frontage on an existing public way, or on a private way laid out by the City Council pursuant to M.G.L. c. 82, §21, of at least 250 feet; provided, however, that said frontage need not be continuous. iii. by inserting after new sub-subsection (i), entitled “Retirement Community – Detached and Townhomes (RCO-D/T),” a new sub-subsection (ii), entitled “Retirement Community - Multifamily (RCO-MF),” as follows: (ii) Retirement Community - Multifamily (RCO-MF). (1) The total area of the tract of contiguous parcels to be developed as an RCO-MF shall not be less than ten (10) acres. The underlying zoning district for all said land shall be either Industrial or Limited Industrial and be located within the area that lies within the perimeter of the following roadways: commencing at the Fitchburg Street intersection at the Rte. 85/290 Connector Road; then west along the Rte. 85/290 Connector Road to the intersection of Rte. 495; then south along Rte. 495 to where it passes over the intersection with Berlin Road; then southeasterly along Berlin Road to the intersection with West Hill Road; then easterly along West Hill Road to the intersection with Pleasant Street; then north along Pleasant Street to the intersection with Fitchburg Street; then north along Fitchburg Street to the intersection with the Rte. 85/290 Connector Road. All of said land being in reasonable proximity to the UMass Memorial Marlborough Hospital and the interstate highway intersection of Rte. 495 and Rte. 290. (2) An RCO-MF may contain one (1)- and two (2)- bedroom units and studio units for independent living persons, and may include services and amenities for its residents, including but not limited to, dining facilities, in-unit kitchens, common rooms, activity rooms, exercise rooms, theater, chapel, library, pharmacy/gift shop/convenience store, beauty salon, barber shop, personal banking services, offices and accessory uses or structures, concierge and valet services, third-party vendor services, and recreation facilities. (3) No building in an RCO-MF shall be more than 3 stories in height. (4) The total number of dwelling units in an RCO-MF shall be limited to 12 units per acre. (5) No part of any principal building in an RCO-MF shall be less than 50 feet from any exterior lot line or less than 100 feet from any public way. (6) Maximum combined lot coverage in an RCO-MF, including any permitted accessory structures, shall not exceed 40% of the tract or contiguous parcels. (7) The tract or contiguous parcels upon which an RCO-MF is located shall have a minimum total frontage on an existing public or private way of at least 200 feet. (8) The City Council may, as a permit condition, require that all proposed condominium bylaws or similar binding RCO-MF regulations which may be relevant to the issuance of the permit, including but not limited to bylaw provisions prohibiting the presence of children residing in a retirement community and limiting or prohibiting the presence in a retirement community of boats, boat trailers, or recreational vehicles, be made a part of the special permit and that any change to or failure to enforce said provisions shall be a violation of said special permit. (9) The City Council may, as a permit condition, require that a proposed RCO-MF be constructed entirely on one tract and that, from and after the date of the issuance of the building permit for said community no subdivision of said tract shall be allowed without the express approval of the City Council; provided, however, that the recording of a condominium master deed and the conveyance of condominium units within the area covered by said deed shall be allowed. (10) A minimum of 1.0 parking space per dwelling unit shall be provided in an RCO-MF. Attached and detached garages shall count toward this parking requirement. (11) No dwelling unit in an RCO-MF shall contain less than 500 square feet of living area or more than 1300 square feet of living area. (12) No building in an RCO-MF need be located or placed further from the exterior line of any street or public way than the average distance from such street or way line of the dwellings or other principal buildings located on the lots adjacent thereto on either side. In determining such average, a vacant side lot having a frontage of 50 feet or more shall be considered as though occupied by a building having the required setback, and a lot separated from the lot in question only by a vacant lot having a frontage of less than 50 fee shall be deemed an adjacent lot. The point of measurement of the average distance shall be from the closest point of the principal building to the street or public way regardless of parcel ownership. (13) In an RCO-MF, there shall be provided with each multifamily building a landscaped area equal to the greatest single floor area of the building, provided that such landscaped area may include undisturbed natural areas such as vegetated areas, woodlands, wetlands and floodplain areas. APPROVED; adopted. Councilor Irish opposed. First Reading, suspended; Second Reading, adopted; Passage to Enroll, adopted; Passage to Ordain; adopted. No objection to passage in one evening..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 19 (PDF)

Accept and file: Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story...

Minutes, page 25

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling and construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same foundation footprint at 180 Cullinane Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 19-1007512B, FILE; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“FILE”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: That the Communication from City Solicitor, Donald Rider, re: Special Permit for Marc Buchan, to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling and construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same foundation footprint at 180 Cullinane Drive, in proper legal form, Order No. 19-1007512B, FILE; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 25 (PDF)

Grant special permit decision: a Special Permit to Marc Buchan of 180 Cullinane Drive

Minutes, page 26

Adopt orderPassed · Unanimous, 11 present

ORDERED: DECISION ON A SPECIAL PERMIT MARC BUCHAN 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA CITY OF MARLBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL ORDER NO. 19-1007512C DECISION ON AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT The City Council of the City of Marlborough hereby GRANTS the application for a Special Permit to Marc Buchan of 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, as provided in this Decision and subject to the following Findings of Fact and Conditions: PROCEDURAL FINDINGS 1. Marc Buchan, with an address of 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, is the owner of real property located at 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752 (the “Applicant”). 2. The Applicant is the owner of said real property which is described in a deed recorded with the Middlesex South District Registry of Deeds at Book 68745, Page 400, and identified on the City of Marlborough Assessor’s Maps as Map 6, Parcel 115 (the “Site”). 3. The Applicant, on or about December 18, 2018, filed with the City Clerk of the City of Marlborough an Application to City Council for Issuance of Special Permit (the “Application”) under Section 12, Paragraph B of Chapter 650 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of the City of Marlborough to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling located on the Site and to construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same existing foundation footprint (the “Project”). 4. The Application consisted of an original and two copies of the following: (a) Application to the City Council for...

From the minutes

“ORDERED: DECISION ON A SPECIAL PERMIT MARC BUCHAN 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA CITY OF MARLBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL ORDER NO. 19-1007512C DECISION ON AN APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL PERMIT The City Council of the City of Marlborough hereby GRANTS the application for a Special Permit to Marc Buchan of 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, as provided in this Decision and subject to the following Findings of Fact and Conditions: PROCEDURAL FINDINGS 1. Marc Buchan, with an address of 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752, is the owner of real property located at 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA 01752 (the “Applicant”). 2. The Applicant is the owner of said real property which is described in a deed recorded with the Middlesex South District Registry of Deeds at Book 68745, Page 400, and identified on the City of Marlborough Assessor’s Maps as Map 6, Parcel 115 (the “Site”). 3. The Applicant, on or about December 18, 2018, filed with the City Clerk of the City of Marlborough an Application to City Council for Issuance of Special Permit (the “Application”) under Section 12, Paragraph B of Chapter 650 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Code of the City of Marlborough to demolish the existing one story single-family dwelling located on the Site and to construct a new two-story single-family dwelling on the same existing foundation footprint (the “Project”). 4. The Application consisted of an original and two copies of the following: (a) Application to the City Council for Issuance of Special Permit, (b) Special Permit- Summary Impact Statement, (c) Filing Fee check in the amount of $300.00, (d) Plan Delivery Certification, (e) Tax Payment Certification, (f) Abutters List, (g) Existing and Preliminary Site Plans, (h) Architectural Drawings, (i) Certificate of Completeness of Application, and (j) Zoning Denial Letter (dated November 20, 2018), (collectively the “Documents”), which Documents are incorporated herein and become a part of this Decision. Eleven sets of documents were delivered to the City Council and one set each to the Police Chief, the Fire Chief, the City Planner (Building Commissioner), the City Engineer, and the Conservation Officer, all in accordance with Section 59 of Chapter 650 of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Marlborough. 5. In accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the City Council and M.G.L. c. 40A, §§ 9 and 11, the City Council established a date for a public hearing on the Application, and caused to be advertised notice of said hearing and the date thereof in the Main Street Journal. All necessary abutters, as certified by the Office of the Marlborough Assessors, were provided notice as required by law. 6. The Marlborough City Council held a public hearing on the Application on February 25, 2019 in accordance with the published notice (the “Public Hearing”). The time for the City Council to take final action on the Application is May 26, 2019, a Sunday; per M.G.L. c. 4, § 9 the next succeeding business day for final action is Tuesday, May 28, 2019. 7. The Applicant presented testimony at the Public Hearing detailing the Project, its impact upon the neighborhood, and such issues as the City Council and members of the public deemed appropriate. Members of the public had the opportunity to testify at the Public Hearing. Subjects of concern were the deteriorated condition of the existing single-family dwelling, the proposed new two story single-family dwelling, and the existing foundation side setback. A direct abutter, Shawn McCarthy of 185 Cullinane Drive, spoke in support of the Project. 8. The Site is located in the A-3 zoning district. 9. The Building Commissioner has determined that the existing one-story single-family dwelling, which is located on a nonconforming lot, is a legal pre-existing nonconforming structure with respect to side yard setback; and that the proposed two- story single-family dwelling would increase or intensify the setback nonconformity. Specifically, the A-3 zoning district, where the Site is located, requires a side yard setback of 15′, whereas the existing one-story single-family dwelling does not conform because of its existing side yard setback of 5′. The proposed reconstruction of the dwelling would add an additional second floor within the side yard setback area, thereby intensifying the setback nonconformity and requiring a special permit from the City Council. The Zoning Denial Letter of the Building Commissioner, dated November 20, 2018, is attached hereto as “Attachment A.” 10. The existing site plan submitted with the Application is entitled, “Existing Conditions Plan, Located at 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough MA; Prepared for: Marc Buchan, 65 Country Lane, Marlborough, MA 01752;” Prepared by: Land Planning, Inc., 167 Hartford Ave., Bellingham, MA 02019; graphic scale 1″ = 10´; dated April 30, 2018 (Sheet No. 1) (the “Existing Conditions Plan”), attached hereto as “Attachment B.” 11. The site plan submitted with the Application is entitled, “Site Plan, Located at 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough MA; Prepared for: Marc Buchan, 65 Country Lane, Marlborough, MA 01752;” Prepared by: Land Planning, Inc., 167 Hartford Ave., Bellingham, MA 02019; graphic scale 1″ = 10´; dated March 24, 2017 (Sheet No. 1) (the “Site Plan”), attached hereto as “Attachment C.” 12. The architectural drawings submitted with the Application are entitled “Private Residence, 180 Cullinane Drive, Marlborough, MA;” Prepared by: VU Architecture, 167 Annie Moore Road, Bolton, MA 01740; dated August 31, 2017 (Drawing Nos. A-1, A-2, A-3, A-4) (the “Architectural Drawings”) attached hereto as “Attachment D.” BASED ON THE ABOVE, THE MARLBOROUGH CITY COUNCIL MAKES THE FOLLOWING FINDING OF FACT AND TAKES THE FOLLOWING ACTIONS: A. The City Council finds that it may grant a Special Permit subject to such terms and conditions as it deems necessary and reasonable to protect the citizens of the City of Marlborough (also referenced herein as the “City”). B. The City Council finds the Application for the Special Permit does not derogate from the intent or purpose of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Marlborough. C. The Applicant has complied with all Rules and Regulations promulgated by the Marlborough City Council as they pertain to special permit applications. D. The City Council makes these findings subject to the completion and adherence by the Applicant, his successors and/or assigns to the conditions more fully set forth herein. E. The City Council finds that the expansion or alteration of the existing legally nonconforming one story single-family structure at the Site, by demolition thereof and construction of the proposed new two-story single-family dwelling, is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-conforming use and structure, that it is an appropriate use, and that is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Marlborough when subject to the appropriate terms and conditions as provided herein. F. The City Council, pursuant to its authority under M.G.L. c. 40A and the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Marlborough, hereby GRANTS the Applicant a Special Permit to build a single-family dwelling as shown on the Plans filed, SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, which conditions shall be binding on the Applicant, his successors and/or assigns: 1. Demolition and Construction in Accordance with Applicable Laws. Demolition and construction of all structures on the Site is to be in accordance with all applicable building codes and zoning regulations in effect in the City of Marlborough and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and shall be built according to the Site Plan and Architectural Drawings as may be subject to minor modifications with prior written approval of the Building Commissioner. 2. Work in Conformance with Special Permit. All work performed at the Site shall be done in compliance with this Special Permit decision. 3. Recording of Special Permit. In accordance with the provisions of M.G.L. c. 40A, Section 11, the Applicant at his expense shall record this Special Permit in the Middlesex South District Registry of Deeds after the City Clerk has certified that the twenty-day period for appealing the Special Permit has elapsed with no appeal having been filed, and before the Applicant shall apply to the Building Commissioner for a building permit concerning the proposed expansion. Applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded Special Permit to the City Council’s office, to the Building Department and to the City Solicitor’s office. APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 11 – Nay: 0 Yea: Delano, Doucette, Dumais, Tunnera, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Juaire, Oram, Ossing & Robey..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 26 (PDF)

Go into executive session

Minutes, page 29

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 11 present

ORDERED: It is moved, in conformance with MGL c. 30A, § 21(a)(3), that the Marlborough City Council conduct an executive session for the purpose of discussing strategy in litigation involving property off Williams Street, as an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the City Council, and the chair hereby declares that an open meeting may have that effect. It is further moved and stated that the City Council will re-convene in open session after the executive session for the purposes of adjournment only. APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 11 – Nay: 0 Yea: Delano, Doucette, Dumais, Tunnera, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Juaire, Oram, Ossing & Robey.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: It is moved, in conformance with MGL c. 30A, § 21(a)(3), that the Marlborough City Council conduct an executive session for the purpose of discussing strategy in litigation involving property off Williams Street, as an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the City Council, and the chair hereby declares that an open meeting may have that effect. It is further moved and stated that the City Council will re-convene in open session after the executive session for the purposes of adjournment only. APPROVED; adopted. Yea: 11 – Nay: 0 Yea: Delano, Doucette, Dumais, Tunnera, Irish, Clancy, Landers, Juaire, Oram, Ossing & Robey..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 29 (PDF)

Adjourn

Minutes, page 29

ProceduralPassed · Voice vote, names not recorded

ORDERED: There being no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council is herewith adjourned at 10:35 PM; adopted.

The minutes record the result only (“adopted.”), with no count or names, so MassVoter shows the result only and does not show how each councilor voted.

From the minutes

“ORDERED: There being no further business, the regular meeting of the City Council is herewith adjourned at 10:35 PM; adopted..”

Read it in the official minutes, page 29 (PDF)

From the Marlborough City Council’s official minutes, posted by the City Clerk in the city’s Agenda Center (City Council). We check every vote against the councilors present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Councilor photos: Marlborough Patch candidate profiles (photos courtesy of the candidates; cropped by MassVoter). Trey Fuccillo: The Berkeley Beacon (Ashlyn Wang). The city website has no councilor photos. Heather Gould and former councilors show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.