← Hull Select Board

Hull Select Board · 2019–2020 Board · Regular meeting

January 27, 2020

4 recorded votes, 0 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF) · Agenda

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Hull ballot: 13 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Domenico Sestito, Jennifer Constable, Kevin Richardson, John Reilly

Absent: Greg Grey

Every vote, in order

Deny Extenet's application dated 1/27/2020 and to move that Extenet's application for a ground location dated 9/26/2019 and supplement dated 11/27/2019 be denied for each of the following...

Minutes, page 4

DenyPassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To deny Extenet's application dated 1/27/2020 and to move that Extenet's application for a ground location dated 9/26/2019 and supplement dated 11/27/2019 be denied for each of the following independently sufficient reasons: 1. Extenet has chosen not to provide information on the "maximum number of transmitters the system is designed to be expandable to" on each of the three proposed new nodes, or or information on the maximum output power of the maximum number of transmitters, or a Radio Frequency Energy Emissions analysis showing that each proposed node, "with the designed expansion capability, will be compliant with applicable federal and state requirements with respect to human exposure to RFE." As a result of its decision not to provide this information, Extenet has failed to meet the requirements of the Hull SWF Policies, Section 6(c)(vi)(2)(3). 2. Extenet has chosen not to present any information on how the proposed nodes will affect any wireless provider's service in Hull and thus failed to establish that without the new nodes any wireless providers' service will be "effectively prohibited." As a result of its decision not to provide this information, Extenet has failed to meet the requirements of the Hull SWF Policies, Section 6(o). 3. Extenet has chosen not to provide an Engineer's certification that the new poles Extenet Proposes for each of the proposed nodes "will safely support the proposed equipment." As a result of its decision not to provide this information,

From the minutes

“Motion Reilly To deny Extenet's application dated 1/27/2020 and to move that Extenet's application for a ground location dated 9/26/2019 and supplement dated 11/27/2019 be denied for each of the following independently sufficient reasons: 1. Extenet has chosen not to provide information on the "maximum number of transmitters the system is designed to be expandable to" on each of the three proposed new nodes, or or information on the maximum output power of the maximum number of transmitters, or a Radio Frequency Energy Emissions analysis showing that each proposed node, "with the designed expansion capability, will be compliant with applicable federal and state requirements with respect to human exposure to RFE." As a result of its decision not to provide this information, Extenet has failed to meet the requirements of the Hull SWF Policies, Section 6(c)(vi)(2)(3). 2. Extenet has chosen not to present any information on how the proposed nodes will affect any wireless provider's service in Hull and thus failed to establish that without the new nodes any wireless providers' service will be "effectively prohibited." As a result of its decision not to provide this information, Extenet has failed to meet the requirements of the Hull SWF Policies, Section 6(o). 3. Extenet has chosen not to provide an Engineer's certification that the new poles Extenet Proposes for each of the proposed nodes "will safely support the proposed equipment." As a result of its decision not to provide this information, Extenet has failed to meet the requirements of the Hull SWF Policies, Section 6(f). Second Constable Vote Unanimous.” (Motion: Reilly, second: Constable)

Read it in the official minutes, page 4 (PDF)

Designate the following positions as Special Municipal Employee positions under the Conflict of Interest law: 1. would be a substitute teacher who works no more than 800 hours in the preceding 365...

Minutes, page 5

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To designate the following positions as Special Municipal Employee positions under the Conflict of Interest law: 1. would be a substitute teacher who works no more than 800 hours in the preceding 365 days and 2. an on-call worker, specifically in the Town Clerk's office

From the minutes

“Motion Richardson To designate the following positions as Special Municipal Employee positions under the Conflict of Interest law: 1. would be a substitute teacher who works no more than 800 hours in the preceding 365 days and 2. an on-call worker, specifically in the Town Clerk's office Second Reilly Vote Unanimous.” (Motion: Richardson, second: Reilly)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Approve a One Day Liquor License for Hull Lifesaving Museum, 1117 Nantasket Avenue, on Monday January 27, 2020 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. for Hotel/Restaurant Familiarization Tour

Minutes, page 5

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To approve a One Day Liquor License for Hull Lifesaving Museum, 1117 Nantasket Avenue, on Monday January 27, 2020 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. for Hotel/Restaurant Familiarization Tour

From the minutes

“Motion Reilly To approve a One Day Liquor License for Hull Lifesaving Museum, 1117 Nantasket Avenue, on Monday January 27, 2020 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. for Hotel/Restaurant Familiarization Tour Second Constable Vote Unanimous.” (Motion: Reilly, second: Constable)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

Go into Executive Session to discuss strategy relative to litigation and that the Chair declares that an Open Meeting would have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the Board...

Minutes, page 5

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 4 present

That the Board go into Executive Session to discuss strategy relative to litigation and that the Chair declares that an Open Meeting would have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the Board specifically as it pertains to Extenet

From the minutes

“Motion Reilly That the Board go into Executive Session to discuss strategy relative to litigation and that the Chair declares that an Open Meeting would have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the Board specifically as it pertains to Extenet Second Richardson Vote Unanimous Constable – Aye Sestito – Aye Richardson – Aye Reilly – Aye.” (Motion: Reilly, second: Richardson)

Read it in the official minutes, page 5 (PDF)

From the Hull Select Board’s official minutes, posted on the town’s Agenda Center. We check every vote against the Select Board members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Photos of current members: Greg Grey (May 2024), Irwin Nesoff and Brian McCarthy (May 2025) and Susan Short Green (April 2026) from The Hull Times candidate statements; Jerry Taverna from Hull Community Television’s 2026 candidate statements video. Former members show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.