← Easton Select Board

Easton Select Board · 2022–2023 Board · Regular meeting

May 16, 2022

5 recorded votes, 0 with disagreement.

Sources: Official minutes (PDF)

A monthly email on what it voted on, starting in November.

Election Day · Tuesday, Nov 3

Your Easton ballot: 14 quizzes, about a minute each.

Start my ballot →

Attendance

Present: Dottie Fulginiti, Craig Barger, Marc Lamb, Jennifer Stacy

Absent: Jamie Stebbins

Every vote, in order

Contract Award: PFAS Preparedness Study - Environmental Partners Contract Amendment #3 – WAT2021-02

1 Approve Amendment #3 to the PFAS Preparedness Study Contract from Environmental Partners/WAT2021-02 in the amount of $54,520

Minutes, page 1

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To approve Amendment #3 to the PFAS Preparedness Study Contract from Environmental Partners/WAT2021-02 in the amount of $54,520.

From the minutes

“Vote: Unanimous by roll call to approve Amendment #3 to the PFAS Preparedness Study Contract from Environmental Partners/WAT2021-02 in the amount of $54,520..” (Motion: Barger, second: Lamb)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Contract Award: Red Mill Road Water Treatment Plant Design – Environmental Partners Contract Amendment #2 –

2 Approve Amendment #2 of the Red Mill Road Water Treatment Plant Design Contract with Environmental Partners/WAT2021-01 in the amount of $20,000

Minutes, page 1

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To approve Amendment #2 of the Red Mill Road Water Treatment Plant Design Contract with Environmental Partners/WAT2021-01 in the amount of $20,000

From the minutes

“Vote: Unanimous by roll call to approve Amendment #2 of the Red Mill Road Water Treatment Plant Design Contract with Environmental Partners/WAT2021-01 in the amount of $20,000.” (Motion: Barger, second: Lamb)

Read it in the official minutes, page 1 (PDF)

Contract Award: WES Construction Contract – PFAS Construction Contract – DPW2022-24

3 Approve the WES Construction PFAS Construction Contract/DPW2022-24 in the amount of $7,243,900

Minutes, page 2

ApprovePassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To approve the WES Construction PFAS Construction Contract/DPW2022-24 in the amount of $7,243,900.

From the minutes

“Vote: Unanimous by roll call to approve the WES Construction PFAS Construction Contract/DPW2022-24 in the amount of $7,243,900..” (Motion: Barger, second: Lamb)

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

Acceptance of Minutes – May 2, 2022

5 Accept the Select Board meeting minutes from May 2, 2022

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To accept the Select Board meeting minutes from May 2, 2022.

From the minutes

“Vote: Unanimous by roll call to accept the Select Board meeting minutes from May 2, 2022..” (Motion: Barger, second: Lamb)

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

5 Adjourn the meeting at 6:09 PM and adjourn to Executive Session and not to return to the open Select Board Meeting. Unanimous by roll call to go into Executive Session under M.G.L. c. 30A, § 21(a)(3), to discuss strategy with respect to litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the public body and the chair so declares – Griffin v. Civil Service Commission, No. 2273-CV-126 (Mass. Super).; not to

Minutes, page 2

ProceduralPassed · Unanimous, 4 present

To adjourn the meeting at 6:09 PM and adjourn to Executive Session and not to return to the open Select Board Meeting. Unanimous by roll call to go into Executive Session under M.G.L. c. 30A, § 21(a)(3), to discuss strategy with respect to litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the public body and the chair so declares – Griffin v. Civil Service Commission, No. 2273-CV-126 (Mass. Super).; not to

From the minutes

“Vote: Unanimous by roll call to adjourn the meeting at 6:09 PM and adjourn to Executive Session and not to return to the open Select Board Meeting. Unanimous by roll call to go into Executive Session under M.G.L. c. 30A, § 21(a)(3), to discuss strategy with respect to litigation if an open meeting may have a detrimental effect on the litigating position of the public body and the chair so declares – Griffin v. Civil Service Commission, No. 2273-CV-126 (Mass. Super).; not to return to open session. (6:09 PM) Fulginiti-yes; Barger-yes; Lamb-yes; Stacy-yes.” (Motion: Barger, second: Lamb)

Read it in the official minutes, page 2 (PDF)

From the Easton Select Board’s official minutes, posted on the town’s Documents on Demand site. We check every vote against the members present and quote the exact wording. MassVoter never grades or scores officials. Member photos: cropped from the Town of Easton’s Select Board group photo (2023), easton.ma.us. Former members show initials.

How to read these pagesWhere the votes come from, how we check them against the official minutes, what isn't included yet, and how to report a mistake.About city pages →
Get an email when new quizzes open

MassVoter.com · nonpartisan match quiz · About · How the Legislature voted · Local Votes · Privacy · Support MassVoter

Report an error on this page

See something wrong? A wrong vote, name, date or number? Tell us and we’ll check it against the source and fix it. Fixes are listed on our corrections page.